Posts belonging to Category 'solar pv panel'

solar battery thin film solar pv panel chargers

Question:

Hi, thin film solar pv panel I have designed several solar charge systems for various installations. The ratings for the panels are for solar noon, with the incidence set at the proper angle. Any shadowing/interference will degrade the system. You can get solar charge controllers to monitor the charge for the input to the battery system. These chargers can be rather expensive, depending on the type selected. thin film solar pv panel I have used units from Trace and find them to be dependable and rugged. You might check; http://www.traceengineering.com/products/charge_controller/index.html BTW, I am not affiliated with Trace or do I sell anything that was discussed. http://www.traceengineering.com/products/charge_controller/index.html If all you want to do is just top your batteries while on board then you might just make a  connection between the battery and your PV. thin film solar pv panel The rating of solar panels is in direct sunlight (high noon)thin film solar pv panel

Response:

I have no personal experience with solar panels but several friends had them on their boat and changed out for wind generators. A lot would depend on where the boat is kept.  (trailer, mooring, slip etc.) The rating of solar panels is in direct sunlight (high noon)          thin film solar pv panel

Response:

Hello gentlemen (and ladies), We have a Bristol 26′ with a Johnson 10hp electric start outboard. We have been advised that the best way to keep the batteries charged is to use a solar charger. Has anybody any advice to offer on a suitable one to buy? And from whom, if relevant. We are in Rhode Island, where you can have a longish string of cloudy/foggy days. I would appreciate direct answers, since I am not a regular reader of this newsgroup. thin film solar pv panel

Response:

I once heard that somebody (a CG licensed captain but, as far as I know, no medical training to back himself up) explained the reason seasickness resulted in “sickness” was because disturbances in the inner ear mimic a food poisoning-type infection, both of which bring on aches, vomiting, and the like.  That seemed cockamamy to me, but boast of no medical knowledge either.  Anybody heard of this, or know of a reason someone would think such a thing? thin film solar pv panel

Response:

…A theory that I like is that seasickness results from       inability of brain to resolve conflicting information from eyes       seeing a stable room around them when below and ears which are       reporting violent motion.  If eyes can see motion, the brain is       less confused. My understanding is that the “ocular-vestibular conflict” described above is the accepted explanation for motion sickness. But the question remains – WHY is the stomach hooked into this loop? Best explanation I’ve seen it that it has real survival value in pre-agricultural hunter-gatherer cultures. Lots of stuff is toxic to eat, and a common short-term reaction to dangerous toxins is dizzyness and disorientation. So the safest reaction to disorientation is to thow up immediately! Humans being inclined, as they are, to ignore sage advice from elders, this response might have been crucial to the survival of the species. How can we use this? If you subscribe to one or more of the various theories about healing visualization and self-directed cures, it might do some good to announe to yourself “I have not eaten anything toxic” and see if the nausea goes away. thin film solar pv panel

Response:

thin film solar pv panel  There is a reason that the poles are cold……   I have a “chart”, published by Sensor Technology Inc, that shows the *annual* solar radiation (in kj/cm**2) around the world.  It takes into account typical weather patterns, and presents the data in a nice color coded contour map.   For the most part, the tropics (+/- 23 degrees) get over 600 kj/cm**2.   There are a few “hot spots” (roughly centered over all the major deserts in the world) that peak out at 800 kj/cm**2.   The northern United States area gets about 500 kj/cm**2.  By the time you are in mid Canada, the available energy has dropped to 400 kj/cm**2.  Alaska gets about 350, and north of that is below 300.   The data from Sensor Technology suggests that solar power is only practical at lattitudes of +/- 40 degrees.

Rod, Does this assume your collector is horizontal?  I’m sure that there is a fall-off due to the increase in atmosphere between the surface and the sun, but I’m surprised it’s that severe.  (Would the numbers be higher if the collector were vertical at the pole on the equinox?) thin film solar pv panel

Response:

The reason solar power falls off as you go North is because the incidence of the rays striking the panels increases.  During winter in the Northern hemisphere the angle between the sun and a horizontal (as should be mounted on a sail boat) decreases since the sun has moved south. For greatest efficiency the panel should be adjusted (assuming land so that the panel can be pointed towards the sun) so that at high noon the sun’s rays are perpendicular to the face of the panel.thin film solar pv panel

thin film solar pv panel

Response:

The point of the reflectors is to gather *incidental* light to the cell.  The rays of sun coming through the atmosphere are diffused. By using a reflector, some of these incidental rays can be directed to the cell  used.         A reflector is not going to double the output of the cell, but it’s far cheaper than another cell.  It’s almost a case of something for nothing.

Unfortunately, I don’t yet have a solar panel on my boat.  For those out there that do, it sure would be useful for some of you to set up a couple of simple reflectors.  How about the alum. foil over cardboard, or a piece of cardboard spray painted white.  Just watch the ammeter as you try the panel at various angles and tell us what effect there is. What angle works best.  Compare clear sky vs. cloudy.  Good easy empirical testing.  I hope to hear back from you with some data.thin film solar pv panel

Response:

At the end of this year I am planning to take a sailing vacation on a 45′ boat. I have been on boats for only a couple of offshore boats before and know that my stomach does not handle the seas very well. My questions is, is there a point after being on a boat for awhile that you will actually quit being nauseous?  Or will I just have to rough it out for five days?thin film solar pv panel

Response:

I have a “chart”, published by Senso Technology Inc, that shows the *annual* solar radiation (in kj/cm**2) around the world.  It takes into account typical weather patterns, and presents the data in a nice color coded contour map. Though this info is useful, from the cruiser’s perspective, a comparison based on the sailing season in various areas would be more apropos.

Furthermore, I doubt that the “chart” takes into consideration the reduced efficiency of solar panels as they get hotter. Cold air, bright sun is the best.

Response:

At the end of this year I am planning to take a sailing vacation on a 45′ boat. I have been on boats for only a couple of offshore boats before and know that my stomach does not handle the seas very well. My questions is, is there a point after being on a boat for awhile that you will actually quit being nauseous?  Or will I just have to rough it out for five days? Adam

Depends on where you go. Couple of our crew in the BVI one year were less than comfortable for the whole 8 days and only happy on land. Since, have discovered those wrist bands that invoke the accupressure point and some people have felt much better. thin film solar pv panel

Response:

If I look at the maps, then 45 North in the Pacific Northwest (rain, drizzle, showers, overcast) is not a very good spot for solar energy.   However, during the boating season we have long days, very little cloud or rain.  The maps are intended for permanent installations; boaters’ needs will be a bit different, and in my case they’re more flexible.thin film solar pv panel

Response:

In your example, if the sun is directly overhead and the reflectors (attached to the edges of the solar panel) are at 45 deg. angle to the panel, the light reflected from the reflectors would not strike the solar panel at all,

You’re absolutely right.  Sorry.  The panels would have to be at a steeper angle, hence that’d reduce the light gathering area.  Best, I suppose, would be something akin to a reflective Fresnel lens.  Even better than that, would be a panel that will absorb light from both sides.  Place it in front, and have panels around it and below it reflecting light back to the panel.  If the panel is opaque from one side, turn it over and have all the light reflected back to it.  Get this complicated enough and the reflectors really start focusing the light and the panel melts.  Someone else mentioned the benefit of keeping the panel cool.  A simple idea is getting more complicated by the second. Yes, I agree but dont you think the panel would be more efficient with direct rather than reflected light? In other words angle the solar panel rather than the reflector. thin film solar pv panel

thin film solar pv panel

Response:

The data from Sensor Technology suggests that solar power is only practicle at lattitudes of +/- 40 degrees.   thin film solar pv panel

No. This is where it is most efficient. It can still be used. You just need more cells for the same power output. The GNWT uses solar power water level monitors for it’s remote sensing in the Canadian Arctic. I have used solar on Baffin Island. Don Haines

Response:

The point of the reflectors is to gather *incidental* light to the cell.  The rays of sun coming through the atmosphere are diffused. By using a reflector, some of these incidental rays can be directed to the cell  used.           A reflector is not going to double the output of the cell, but it’s far cheaper than another cell.  It’s almost a case of something for nothing.         – John Wren – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The output declines with decreasing angle of incidence but doesn’t end. Suppose the sun is directly over head, i.e. normal to the horizontal surface of the panel.  The reflectors would be at a 45 deg. angle, and the light reflecting from the panels would strike the panel at about 45 deg.. In your example, if the sun is directly overhead and the reflectors (attached to the edges of the solar panel) are at 45 deg. angle to the panel, the light reflected from the reflectors would not strike the solar panel at all, it would be reflected parallel to it. Draw it on your sketch pad to see for yourself. snip… If the sun has an altitude of less than 45 deg. and the reflector on the side of the panel away from the sun is angled appropriately, the angle of incidence of the light on the panel off the reflector will be closer to vertical than the direct light. — Yes, I agree but dont you think the panel would be more efficient with direct rather than reflected light? In other words angle the solar panel rather than the reflector.thin film solar pv panel

thin film solar pv panel

Response:

Solar panels work the best in the tropics, but the available energy drops off as you go towards the poles.  If you have mostly cloudy days on top of that, the efficiency of a solar panel would be rather poor.   You can always offset that by getting a larger solar panel.

Has anyone tried having a reflective panel, e.g. polished aluminum, hinged to the edge of your solar array?  Have removeable hinge pins so that you can hinge from any edge.  Keep it closed for protection when needed and/or in stormy conditions.  Hinge it up on the side away from the sun to reflect additional light onto the panel.  This’ll increase the effective size of the panel.  It’ll be most effective when the sun is at lower altitudes.  You could combine 4 reflective panels, (one from each edge) along with an aimable panel and have an even more effective light gatherer.  Might even help on cloudy days with the panel horizontal and the collecting mirrors concentrating the diffuse light. — Mark Anderson Riparia “The trouble with good ideas is that they soon degenerate into a lot of hard work” thin film solar pv panel

Response:

Where to buy Solar-powered solar pv panels 210 watts landscape lighting?

Question:

Check out solar pv panels 210 watts  the mail-order firm Global Merchants at http://www.global-merchants.com/home/solars.htm.  They have several decent models of solar-powered lights.  Expect a long download time for the front page.

Response:

I saw one at Home Depot also.  They solar pv panels 210 watts are really just toys for grown-ups. The light output is abysmal and will only last a couple of hours after sunset.  Baiscally the problem with these solar lights is that the solar  panel and the battery are inadequately sized. Check out Super WalMart. They have them for about $17 a piece. Good price. Just stick them in the ground. Kathy

Response:

I have only found one or two places that sell solar pv panels 210 watts solar-powered landscape lighting.  These lights look very much like the low voltage pagoda-style lighting that is readily available anywhere.  But for many reasons, I would prefer to use the solar-powered lighting, but they are hard to find, and are quite expensive.  Does anyone have any opinions on these lights?  And, can anyone tell me where I might buy them? of walking around the pool in the dark

check on BP  (british petroleum) and Seimens  they produce some plastic compact units that are quite neat as garden light (and decor) ..Light up a 6 watt floresence lamp for a few hours. Of course it is not really bright. Cost about 30usd couple of years ago , should be cheaper now. If you want more powerful versions, they have it too, but I know little of them.

Response:

Does anyone have any opinions on these solar pv panels 210 watts  lights? And, can anyone tell me where I might buy them?

They need quite a few hours of direct sun per day to function, and I found the light they put out to be totally inadequate. I bought some at Home Depot, and ended up returning them– go with the low-voltage type. More dependable and lots less $$. Toni www.irish-wolfhounds.com

Response:

Check out Super WalMart. They have them for about $17 a piece. Good price. Just stick them in the ground. solar pv panels 210 watts.

Response:

I do not know where you are located…but I would highly discourage solar lighting.  I bought several of solar pv panels 210 watts them and placed them throughout the yard.  They stopped working just past a year (long enough for the warranty to expire).  The brand I bought were Siemens (sp?).  I live in Metro-Phoenix, and the only thing that I can think of that might have happened, is the intense heat beating down on the top of them made the solder on the circuit board dry or crack, and the connection was lost.  I replaced bulbs and everything, and they still would not work.  What a waste of money!  I paid something like $37 a piece at that time– thinking higher cost, better quality, NOT! Regards, Alan Check out Super WalMart. They have them for about $17 a piece. Good price. Just stick them in the ground.

Response:

laugh!  Expensive toys at that

Response:

I just saw some at our local solar pv panels 210 watts Costco for $100 and contains around 5 or 6. Not knowing where you are from I can’t tell if this helps.

Battery charging evergreen solar pv panel

Question:

Have a evergreen solar pv panel Magnetek Series 6300A, Model 6332 with Option A converter in my rig. Can I assume that a theoretical maximum of 12 amps is available for the battery with the remainder of the converter output (20 amps) available for use in the rig?evergreen solar pv panel, is there any type of “sensor” which detects battery condition so as to reduce charging current as the battery becomes charged? evergreen solar pv panel

Response:

Have a Magnetek Series 6300A, Model 6332 with Option A converter in my rig. Can I assume that a theoretical maximum of 12 amps is available for the battery with the remainder of the converter output (20 amps) available for use in the rig? Also, is there any type of “sensor” which detects battery condition so as to reduce charging current as the battery becomes charged? evergreen solar pv panel

According to my literature, the “A” option is an automatic shore power/ generator switch. The “C” option is a 12 amp charger, and the “CC” option is a seven amp charger (the options go on and on listing breakers installed, etc.)         evergreen solar pv panel I like your ideas on building the very cheap bat charging system,maybe someday you could post some photos of your project as you build it?   Thanks I’m building a DC generator which is what I suggest you might do. My primary power need is to top off a 350ah deep cycle batt. Usually PVs keep the batts full but there are times when I binge on power or the sky doesn’t cooperate. Northern is shipping me a OHC 5hp Honda ($195) which I’ll use to spin a Mopar 100 amp alternator (loaded max 60%).

Will be taking some photos along the way. Recieved the motor today and hope to have the DC Genny built in a couple months (taking the time to do this right). Goals are reliability, light wieght, good fuel economy, voltage control and good instrumentation. The motor manual for the Honda I got claims .51 lbs of fuel per horsepower per hour. Using 1 horse from the motor (20% load) should let me charge at the optimum rating (C/10) for my 350ah battery pack of 35 amps. In theroy this is a cup (8oz) of gas per hour; 16 hours to a gallon…pretty amazing. I won’t really believe it until I measure it though. Will keep the group posted..evergreen solar pv panelI’m building a DC generator which is what I suggest you might do. My primary power need is to top off a 350ah deep cycle batt. Usually PVs keep the batts full but there are times when I binge on power or the sky doesn’t cooperate. Northern is shipping me a OHC 5hp Honda ($195) which I’ll use to spin a Mopar 100 amp alternator (loaded max 60%). All it takes is an engine, alternator, belt, a pulley, wire and something to bolt it to. evergreen solar pv panel Saw a setup a fellow did with an old vertical shaft lawn mover; he put a pulley on the motor shaft and cut a hole in the mower deck for the alternator. Cost him almost zip to build and charged hundreds of batteries over the years. If you don’t need AC it’s a cheap and efficient way to go. Just to pique your interest…I’m going to try and build a cogen add-on for my DC genny to pick waste heat from the motor cooling air. I want to use two heat exchangers (aka heater cores) in a hydronic loop for opportunity heating in the RV. For an average small motor maybe 20% of the energy in gas turns the crank, 25% heats the motor and 50% goes out the exhaust as waste heat plus a little for friction. Hate seeing all those BTU go to waste. I’m leery of using the waste heat from the motor directly though. evergreen solar pv panel. Do you have any experience with the Heart Interface voltage regulator for alternators? It has a three step charging rate (charge, float, and equalize, all adjustable, I think), though it is pretty pricey!         As to the waste heat, 1,000,000 VW owners can’t be all wrong (well probably 900,000 that are still alive).evergreen solar pv panel

Response:

evergreen solar pv panelI’m building a DC generator which is what I suggest you might do. My primary power need is to top off a 350ah deep cycle batt. Usually PVs keep the batts full but there are times when I binge on power or the sky doesn’t cooperate. Northern is shipping me a OHC 5hp Honda ($195) which I’ll use to spin a Mopar 100 amp alternator (loaded max 60%). All it takes is an engine, alternator, belt, a pulley, wire and something to bolt it to. Saw a setup a fellow did with an old vertical shaft lawn mover; he put a pulley on the motor shaft and cut a hole in the mower deck for the alternator. Cost him almost zip to build and charged hundreds of batteries over the years. If you don’t need AC it’s a cheap and efficient way to go. Just to pique your interest…I’m going to try and build a cogen add-on for my DC genny to pick waste heat from the motor cooling air. I want to use two heat exchangers (aka heater cores) in a hydronic loop for opportunity heating in the RV. For an average small motor maybe 20% of the energy in gas turns the crank, 25% heats the motor and 50% goes out the exhaust as waste heat plus a little for friction. Hate seeing all those BTU go to waste. I’m leery of using the waste heat from the motor directly though. DCK Don Kulha, Sonoma CA    KE6QHP Don,    This is very interesting. Do you have any experience with the Heart Interface voltage regulator for alternators? It has a three step charging rate (charge, float, and equalize, all adjustable, I think), though it is pretty pricey!

evergreen solar pv panel

Response:

Northern is shipping me a OHC 5hp Honda ($195) which I’ll use to spin a Mopar 100 amp alternator (loaded max 60%). All it takes is an engine, alternator, belt, a pulley, wire and something to bolt it to.

Don, Who is Northern?  Address? Gail – in the Great Pacific Northwest

Response:

evergreen solar pv panel

I’d be interested in hearing about the cheap Honda when you get the genset built.  I have been eyeing that Honda as well.  I am particularly curious to find out if it is as loud as the typical 5hp gas engine. Al – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I have decided that a generator is the best way to keep my trailer battery charged.evergreen solar pv panel  I comsume little power (abut 10 to 15 amp hours/day except when there is a need for heat.  I am uncomfortable about putting a catlytic heater with out venting in the trailer so use the furnance.  After some research it looks like using a generator to run a 3 stage charger is the best solution.  I would appreciate any suggestions about brands of gen sets and chargers or anything else. Okay. Well, my first thought is to suggest getting one 50 or 75 watt solar electric panel, a PWM charge controller, some wire, a fuse and a switch….this would *sometimes* fill the bill and be far less annoying than a genny. I’m building a DC generator which is what I suggest you might do. My primary power need is to top off a 350ah deep cycle batt. Usually PVs keep the batts full but there are times when I binge on power or the sky doesn’t cooperate. Northern is shipping me a OHC 5hp Honda ($195) which I’ll use to spin a Mopar 100 amp alternator (loaded max 60%). All it takes is an engine, alternator, belt, a pulley, wire and something to bolt it to. Saw a setup a fellow did with an old vertical shaft lawn mover; he put a pulley on the motor shaft and cut a hole in the mower deck for the alternator. Cost him almost zip to build and charged hundreds of batteries over the years. If you don’t need AC it’s a cheap and efficient way to go. Just to pique your interest…I’m going to try and build a cogen add-on for my DC genny to pick waste heat from the motor cooling air. I want to use two heat exchangers (aka heater cores) in a hydronic loop for opportunity heating in the RV. For an average small motor maybe 20% of the energy in gas turns the crank, 25% heats the motor and 50% goes out the exhaust as waste heat plus a little for friction. Hate seeing all those BTU go to waste. I’m leery of using the waste heat from the motor directly though. DCK Don Kulha, Sonoma CA    KE6QHP     Home Power Magazine – “The Hands-On Journal of Home-Made Power”   evergreen solar pv panel

Response:

The cheater cord is never plugged in unless the inverter is used. Also, the outlet in the compartment is the same one the charger is plugged into, so if dry camping, I unplug the charger, plug in the inverter and switch the fridge to gas. It isn’t foolproof however and if I “forgot” to unplug the inverter, I fry it if I plugged in the shore cord. It’s not perfect but is a cheap way to replace a noisy inverter. Hugh Hugh; If I follow you correctly  you need to be sure the male end blades of your shore power cord are protected as they could short against something or shock the unwary.   evergreen solar pv panel

snipped

Response:

Good point Will. I took care of that by using the same receptacle for both the charger and the inverter. I may substitute a single plug for the double plug. This would guarantee I couldn’t plug in both. I also noted the need to switch the fridge from electric to gas. Our fridge needs attention, roving grounds, and wants to run on electric. Found this out last summer when camping at 8th Lake in the Adirondacks. Had to run the generator more than once a day. Didn’t use the inverter ’cause there wasn’t anybody coming to the boob tube and didn’t have a dish yet. I did put the old converter section on it’s own breaker. Just moved the other circuit over to a less used breaker. This lets me switch the old converter section off but, still lets me use it if my charger dies. Another benefit to a 10 amp charger is, when using the generator to charge, the batteries are getting a good boost instead of the 3 amp the converter gives. The automatic charger can be plugged in full time, since it sits on line sensing battery charge, it can’t hurt the batteries like the constant charge type does. I’ve been using an automatic charger for several years but, up till last year, I turned off the converter at night and plugged in the charger. The converter made enough noise to wake the dead<grin. Now I just plug in my shore cord and forget it. I waited until now to share my humble solution to the Magnetek 6300 converter problem. I know I don’t have 45 amps for charging like the 7300 unit gives but mine didn’t cost $230 either. The chargers last for years, the first time I did this was for the Airstream trailer my Father-in-Law Pete left us. He had already replaced one Uni-Volt and it passed on the same time he did. I bought an automatic 8 amp Sears charger. It worked fine. It lasted for over 10 years before dying. The Sears charger I have now is over 10 years old now and is working fine. Hugh – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – his success substituting a good charger for the OEM junk, and added: I also bought a cheap ($39) 600 watt inverter. I installed it into the same compartment, made up a cheater cord, male plug each end and left it in the compartment. I generally like Hugh’s approach but caution against the double-male “cheater” cord idea, which can seriously zap the unwary.  IMO a better system at similar cost is to wire your system like some MH’s were made by the OEM:   there’s a standard receptacle (usually 30a) in the cord compartment, carrying the output of the genset.   When shore power is not available, the power cord is plugged into that receptacle. That works flawlessly for a genset, but in the case of an inverter, you must avoid any attempts at perpetual motion (!!!) by making sure the inverter isn’t trying to power the charger.  There are several ways to do that, the most obvious being a transfer switch that opens the power to the inverter when shore power is connected.  Another way would be to arrange the dedicated receptacle for the charger so it can only be plugged in when the power cord is NOT in the inverter output.  But I would not recommend that any system be used that depends on the user to remember what sequence to use! NOT recommended that anyone try this stuff unless you are pretty sure you know how to do the wiring correctly. BTW many models of the Heart inverter/charger come with a built-in transfer switch that does all of this stuff automatically. Will Sill KD3XR “I don’t want everyone to like me. I should think less of myself if some people did”. – Henry James

Response:

evergreen solar pv panel I also bought a cheap ($39) 600 watt inverter. I installed it into the same compartment, made up a cheater cord, male plug each end and left it in the compartment. If we’re dry camping, I can plug the cheater cord into the inverter and plug the other end into the outlet in the compartment. I also have to unplug the charger. This gives me 110V throughout the trailer, without the 12V line losses usually associated with remote inverter locations. I also have to remember to switch the fridge to gas. I hope you also remember to open the main circuit breaker.  Otherwise the prongs at the end of your shore cord are energized with 120 volts. I use a 30-15 amp adaptor and plug the shore cord into the inverter.  I substituted a duplex 20 amp breaker for a single 20, and put the refrigerator and charger on the extra pole.  This way I only have to turn off one breaker when I plug into the inverter. Lou Schneider Escapee #31721 email: remove XX  Then turn off the breaker that feeds the fridge and charger (it was easy enough to move the charger to the fridge breaker).

Thanks Lou. Yes I do throw the main breaker. I like your suggestion about using a duplex breaker. Obviously the 30 to 15 adapter is the best way. The male to male plug is one I made up for the house furnace. If we have an outage at home, we only need heat and power for the fridge. The cheater cord lets me use the generater outside and power the important stuff. I flip the switch to the furnace open and have a pigtail wired into the down side going to the furnace power panel. This way, I don’t have to worry about any disconnects to the main power. Thanks to both you and Will for pointing out the obvious. Hugh

evergreen solar pv panel

Response:

evergreen solar pv panelI’m on converter number 5.  Early ones have lasted from 2 months to as few as 2 weeks.  They had fans that only ran when needed.  The most recent one has a fan that runs all the time.  BUT, it also has an audible whine coming from the supposed to be working on some changes to address the much WORSE problem – MAJOR RFI. I’ve made SURE I’m grounded to the trailer frame.  The ground wire is less than 30″ long.  I’ve tried knotting the 120 power cord.  I”ve put in three-to-two prong plug adapter, I’ve moved the converter around… etc.  I’ve even put a box covered with aluminum foil over the whole converter – and GROUNDED the foil……. Nothing has made any difference.  On any tv channel below about 10 -11 there is MASSIVE interference as a series of diagonal, moving, lines.  It improves as the channel goes up – 2 is worst, by 13 its gone.  The RFI is bad enough that with the trailer in the driveway and me in the house, the tv by the front wall closest to the trailer (at LEAST 30-50 feet from the converter) picks up interference…   Todd says they’re working on some better filtering and will continue to make evergreen solar pv panel

evergreen solar pv panel I don’t think you’d be out of line to conclude this is JUNK being sold by someone who has no clue!  FWIW I have ‘enjoyed’ similar results (!) with low-bidder converters in the past, and in one case simply threw the garbage out and wired all circuits to the batteries, installing a good battery charger to keep them up.  Worked perfectly because our average load was always well under the capacity of the charger (10a). The bozo who thinks my advice is outa date probably uses a computer-controlled solar system, but the KISS principle works very well, thank you. Will KD3XR

Response:

Battery charging questions aside, my converter hums fairly loud. Will leaving it plugged in cause a shortening of it’s life enough to be concerned about?         Thanks, evergreen solar pv panel

Um, just out of curiosity, what brand of converter is it?  If it is one from I’m on converter number 5.  Early ones have lasted from 2 months to as few as 2 weeks.  They had fans that only ran when needed.  The most recent one has a fan that runs all the time.  BUT, it also has an audible whine coming from the working on some changes to address the much WORSE problem – MAJOR RFI. I’ve made SURE I’m grounded to the trailer frame.  The ground wire is less than 30″ long.  I’ve tried knotting the 120 power cord.  I”ve put in three-to-two prong plug adapter, I’ve moved the converter around… etc.  I’ve even put a box covered with aluminum foil over the whole converter – and GROUNDED the foil……. Nothing has made any difference.  On any tv channel below about 10 -11 there is MASSIVE interference as a series of diagonal, moving, lines.  It improves as the channel goes up – 2 is worst, by 13 its gone.  The RFI is bad enough that with the trailer in the driveway and me in the house, the tv by the front wall closest to the trailer (at LEAST 30-50 feet from the converter) picks up interference…  

Response:

Hi, In my RV, on the label of the Magnetek 6345 charger it is mentioned that with the option “C”, which I have, there is a battery condition sensor that turns down the charging current when the battery is fully charged. It is the first year that I leave my RV plugged all the time, when not in use, mainly to keep the fridge running. Is there a problem in doing that with this charger? Did someone cook a battery with this charger? What is different with this 7345RU? Also, the fan on my 6345 charger bothers me.  Is there a fan also in this 7345RU?  If yes, is there a charger, without a fan, that I can install? Many questions asked by a newcomer in the RV world. 

Hi Bob,         I think GB hit most of the high points- if the fan is running all the time in yours, it probably needs cleaning and/or a new fan switch. As far as “cooking” the battery is concerned- as long as you keep an eye on the water level in the battery, and the converter is adjusted properly, you should have no problem.         The biggest advavtage to the 7345RU is that all of the power that it puts out (all 45 amps) is very clean- it is used in a “float” type arrangement which means that if you are not running anything 12 volt in your rig, all 45 amps are available for battery charging. In your present 6345- a theoretical maximum of 12 amps is available for the battery- and the remainder of the comverter output (that part not tied to the battery) is not very clean power. Not a big deal for lights, but electronic stuff tends to not be happy about it. Chris Bryant Bryant RV Services

Response:

Hi, I also has the hum coming from the converter. I installed the transformer on rubber bushings realizing that the louder noise was not coming from the transformer but from the contactor.  I had to remove the converter again and to install the contactor on rubber bushings.  It reduced the noise but it did not desappear.

Contactors should not ever buzz.  The buzz is usually caused by crud being between the solenoid pole(s) and the moveable armature.  Such crud will cause buzz.  It will also make the solenoid coil draw more current which will shorten the life of the coil.  Sometimes the crud is a little coil varnish on the pole piece.  A close examination will usually show why it is buzzing. And what about the fan? The noise is a lot louder than the hum.  Did you get rid of it or does your converter/charger not have a fan?

Another one of my pet peeves.  I *hate* fan noise.  I address it by putting the fan on a thermostat.  I use a gas furnace fan thermostat.  This fixed-setpoint Klixon-type thermostat typically closes at about 130 degrees and opens at about 120.  While a thermostat you buy from an name brand dealer probably won’t be marked with the setpont, the  universal thermostats normally sold at appliance and maintenance supply warehouses usually are.  Try to find one that trips as low as 110 degrees if possible.   To install, find the hottest part of the unit, normally the heat sink for the transistors or diodes.  Mount the thermostat to that object and connect the fan in series with it.  If you cannot identify a hot spot, mount the thermostat inside the top of the case. My converter does not have a fan but my welder and my 60 amp battery charger do.  The welder’s fan never runs unless I’m welding continuously for a long period of time.  This is good because that fan sounds like a Hoover!  The battery charger’s fan only runs when either fast-charging a completely dead battery or using the charger to boost start a car. A slightly more sophisticated solution is to use a variable speed muffin fan that contains a built-in temperature sensor.  The fan’s speed varies according to the temperature the sensor sees.  The fan will normally run at a constant but slow speed.  This is better than the on-off operation of a thermostat, particularly when the fan has to cycle under normal conditions.  These fans are available from Ametek/Rotron (http://www.rotron.com) and Papst Mfr (http://www.ebm.com) among others.  MCM Electronics and Newark Electronics are two distributors that stock these fans. John — John De Armond http://neonjohn.4mg.com Neon John’s Custom Neon Cleveland, TN “Bendin’ Glass ‘n Passin’ Gas”

Response:

Leaving it on is ok.  Probably will last longest if left on.  Inductors have nasty trait concerning current and voltage.  Switch them on and off you get current surges and voltage spikes 

Yup. The noisy transformer may have a loose lamination.  There may be another piece of sheet steel near the unit that is vibrating in sympathy with the magnetic field of the transformer. For noise reduction you could try mounting the unit on rubber taking care to keep it solidly restrained.  Also build a box around it with holes for ventilation — check into the hospital for a few days [any malady you can survive will do  :)  use this to line the box -- the rough side goes toward the noise.

There is another solution to this problem, one that addresses the root cause - something loose and vibrating inside the transformer. This solutions assumes you're comfortable enough working inside electrical things to remove the transformer.  Assuming you are, read on. Most of these noise problems originate from the mfrs getting cheap and not varnishing the finished transformer.  The varnish adds insulation and it bonds all surfaces together to prevent them from vibrating.  A final dip and bake costs extra and so they don't do it.  You can. Locate your nearest friendly local electric motor repair shop.  Take the transformer to the motor repair shop and ask them to dip it in their varnish tank.  Make sure they leave it in the tank until all the bubbles quit.  This usually takes 10-15 minutes.  Tell them NOT to dip the leads.  Normally they know not to do this (makes the insulation brittle) but just in case... If your transformer has screw terminals, coat them (and anywhere else you don't want varnish) with a heavy coating of grease.  This will keep the varnish at bay.  Be sure to have a cardboard box lined with a garbage bag with you.  This varnish cures by baking.  It will never dry without baking.  It's REAL sticky when uncured.  CAUTION:  The baking process is fairly stinky.  If you think that will cause domestic problems, let the motor shop bake the transformer.  This will be a come-back-tomorrow affair since the baking takes several hours and they'll probably not want to fire off their oven for one little transformer.  If you want to do it at home, simply put the transformer in the oven, put a foil pan below to catch the drippings and bake for 2-3 hours at 275-300 deg F.  There will be lots of solvent odors but no smoke (unless the varnish drops on the heating element) so the odor won't linger and a vent hood will quickly pull it out. Another source of noise, sometimes significant, is nearby sheetmetal being magnetically stimulated by the leakage flux from the transformer.  This is different from the acoustic stimulation Ben mentioned.  Leakage flux is a sign of a poorly designed transformer.  The solution to the noise is the same - dampen the sheet metal so it won't vibrate.  Two methods I use are dampener sheeting and aerosol automotive undercoating.  The dampening sheeting is made by 3M and is used by body men on sheet metal to make it not resonate.  One of the tricks used to give car doors that nice "thunk" when you slam them.  The stuff comes adhesive-backed and can be cut with ordinary scissors.  Just stick it to the inside of whichever metal panel is vibrating.  Available from auto parts stores that cater to body men.  Undercoating does the same thing but it more inconvenient and messy.  OTOH, it is available almost anywhere car accessories are sold. If you're like me and HATE the sound of buzzing appliances, you probably won't think these solutions to be TOO radical :-)  Nothing less than the total absence of 60hz buzz is acceptable to me.  This solution works well too for those cheap but buzzy mercury vapor security lights one can buy at Wal-Mart, etc.

Response:

In my RV, on the label of the Magnetek 6345 charger it is mentioned that with the option "C", which I have, there is a battery condition sensor that turns down the charging current when the battery is fully charged. It is the first year that I leave my RV plugged all the time, when not in use, mainly to keep the fridge running. Is there a problem in doing that with this charger?

Sorry, I don't know. My information was that mine did not have such a sensor therefore could cook the batteries if I left it plugged in all the time. (It was a model 6325, meaning 25 amps; yours is already 45 amps, which is what the replacement model is). Did someone cook a battery with this charger?

Don't remember hearing anybody say so. I know I didn't. What is different with this 7345RU?

It is solid state with a fully automatic float charger. I don't know the differences between it and your 6345, but "Mike, CA" kindly provided me with this phone number (800/848-0934) which you can use to find out more. It is not Magnetek, but rather a distributor. But the tech support guy I talked was friendly and helpful and seemed knowledgeable. Also, the fan on my 6345 charger bothers me.  Is there a fan also in this 7345RU? If yes, is there a charger, without a fan, that I can install?

There is a fan in the 7345RU, but it comes on only as needed. It is very quiet, though, and I am not bothered by it at all in my Class B. Don't know about a "fanless" charger. HTH. Good luck. GB in NC [For e-mail reply, please remove the last two letters from "yahoooo."]

Response:

-, I also has the hum coming from the converter. I installed the transformer on rubber bushings realizing that the louder noise was not coming from the transformer but from the contactor.  I had to remove the converter again and to install the contactor on rubber bushings.  It reduced the noise but it did not desappear. And what about the fan? The noise is a lot louder than the hum.  Did you get rid of it or does your converter/charger not have a fan? Thanks Bob The noisy transformer may have a loose lamination.  There may be another piece of sheet steel near the unit that is vibrating in sympathy with the magnetic field of the transformer. For noise reduction you could try mounting the unit on rubber taking care to keep it solidly restrained.  Also build a box around it with holes for ventilation — Battery charging questions aside, my converter hums fairly loud. Will leaving it plugged in cause a shortening of it’s life enough to be concerned about?         Thanks, Tom Before you buy.

To address both issues: In our Magnetek, the only time the fan comes on is when there is some problem drawing an overly high rate of current. This then eventually triggers a heat sensor, which cycles the fan on and off. I am pretty sure this is normal operation. The fan being on all the time could indicate: – 12V mode of fridge activated with engine/alternator off (sounds unlikely, but happened to us). – bad battery drawing full charge current all the time. – all your 12V appliances being on at once when it’s 90 degrees inside. – bad power transformer – shorted windings or laminations dissipating a lot of heat. – weak filter capacitors or bad rectifier diode. If by the contactor, you mean the switchover relay, this should not buzz. If it does so, there is quite a lot of AC on its coil. This could be caused either by: – excessive 12V load or – weak filter capacitors or bad rectifier diode. Steve Before you buy.

Response:

Hi, I also has the hum coming from the converter. I installed the transformer on rubber bushings realizing that the louder noise was not coming from the transformer but from the contactor.  I had to remove the converter again and to install the contactor on rubber bushings.  It reduced the noise but it did not desappear. And what about the fan? The noise is a lot louder than the hum.  Did you get rid of it or does your converter/charger not have a fan? Thanks Bob – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The noisy transformer may have a loose lamination.  There may be another piece of sheet steel near the unit that is vibrating in sympathy with the magnetic field of the transformer. For noise reduction you could try mounting the unit on rubber taking care to keep it solidly restrained.  Also build a box around it with holes for ventilation — Battery charging questions aside, my converter hums fairly loud. Will leaving it plugged in cause a shortening of it’s life enough to be concerned about?      

Before you buy.

Response:

short answer be no long answer below irritation not good grace ride in young sons car turn up the BOOMING BASE heard in 100 houses dormer hearing damage takes away irrating noisy  transformer hearing loss is to say,  EH? IMHO (master electricican)– [so much for my humility     :)   :)  well since i quit smoking i get a bit rammy  :)     ] Leaving it on is ok.  Probably will last longest if left on.  Inductors have nasty trait concerning current and voltage.  Switch them on and off you get current surges and voltage spikes — a self destructing behaviour. The noisy transformer may have a loose lamination.  There may be another piece of sheet steel near the unit that is vibrating in sympathy with the magnetic field of the transformer. For noise reduction you could try mounting the unit on rubber taking care to keep it solidly restrained.  Also build a box around it with holes for ventilation — check into the hospital for a few days [any malady you can survive will do  :)  ]  

Response:

Battery charging questions aside, my converter hums fairly loud. Will leaving it plugged in cause a shortening of it’s life enough to be concerned about?         Thanks, Tom

Response:

Hi, In my RV, on the label of the Magnetek 6345 charger it is mentioned that with the option “C”, which I have, there is a battery condition sensor that turns down the charging current when the battery is fully charged. It is the first year that I leave my RV plugged all the time, when not in use, mainly to keep the fridge running. Is there a problem in doing that with this charger? Did someone cook a battery with this charger? What is different with this 7345RU? Also, the fan on my 6345 charger bothers me.  Is there a fan also in this 7345RU?  If yes, is there a charger, without a fan, that I can install? Many questions asked by a newcomer in the RV world. Bob – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – It’s a 45-amp upgrade to any converter in the standard Magnetek 6300 series, called the 7345RU (“RU” = “replacement upgrade”). It slides in and replaces the bottom half of your converter. It costs somewhere around $200, and I installed it myself with pliers and screwdriver in about an hour and a half, without hurrying at all. Clear wiring directions are included. No problem. Seems to do what they say it will do. And, according to the tech service rep I talked to, you can leave your MH plugged in to shore power forever, as long as you check your batteries periodically for a dead cell. Best wishes. GB in NC [For e-mail reply, please remove the last two letters from "yahoooo."]

Before you buy.

Response:

I believe you are refering to the Inteli Power power converter with charge wizard by Progressive Dynamics of Marshall MI. Camping World carries the unit, or you can contact the manufacturer at (616) 781-4241 Some time ago someone in this ng posted a Camping World charger name and item number that could be permanently installed in a mh and powered by either the shoreline or the genset.  This mystery charger would charge my coach batteries at variable rates so as to get the quickest, healthiest charge without cooking them.  I would appreciate it if someone could post the name or item number of that charger. If someone has other suggestions, I would appreciate hearing them. Don MacCluskie Lon VanOstran Williamston, Mi. Endowment Member NRA Life Good Sam FMCA #F227964 SKP 52987 Eagles 4091

Lon, Thanks for the info.  The part suggested by GBinNC is a direct replacement for the converter I am now using and have decided to go with that.  I appreciate your taking the time to research it for me. I believe that the part you came up with is actually the original part from the original post to which I referred. Don MacCluskie

Response:

I believe you are refering to the Inteli Power power converter with charge wizard by Progressive Dynamics of Marshall MI. Camping World carries the unit, or you can contact the manufacturer at (616) 781-4241 Some time ago someone in this ng posted a Camping World charger name and item number that could be permanently installed in a mh and powered by either the shoreline or the genset.  This mystery charger would charge my coach batteries at variable rates so as to get the quickest, healthiest charge without cooking them.  I would appreciate it if someone could post the name or item number of that charger. If someone has other suggestions, I would appreciate hearing them. Don MacCluskie

Lon VanOstran Williamston, Mi. Endowment Member NRA Life Good Sam FMCA #F227964 SKP 52987 Eagles 4091

Response:

It’s a 45-amp upgrade to any converter in the standard Magnetek 6300 series, called the 7345RU (“RU” = “replacement upgrade”). GB in NC That is exactly what I was looking for, although I didn’t know it.  I kept looking at chargers and knew somehow I was headed in the wrong direction.  I ordered it from CW for $257 including shipping.  The price recently went up, that’s what I get for waiting for six months.

Glad I could help. (Isn’t this newsgroup a great resource for getting and giving advice?!) BTW, somebody also suggested hanging on to the old one, along with the 12v fuse block you will also replace during installation (a new one comes with it). The 7345RU is said to be somewhat more likely to suffer damage because of a surge or other electrical problem, and if you still have the old one you can put it back in temporarily if you need to. Best wishes. GB in NC [For e-mail reply, please remove the last two letters from "yahoooo."]

Response:

Some time ago someone in this ng posted a Camping World charger name and item number that could be permanently installed in a mh and It’s a 45-amp upgrade to any converter in the standard Magnetek 6300 series, called the 7345RU (“RU” = “replacement upgrade”). It slides in ….. Best wishes. GB in NC

Thanks, GB That is exactly what I was looking for, although I didn’t know it.  I kept looking at chargers and knew somehow I was headed in the wrong direction.  I ordered it from CW for $257 including shipping.  The price recently went up, that’s what I get for waiting for six months. Thanks again, Don MacCluskie

Response:

Some time ago someone in this ng posted a Camping World charger name and item number that could be permanently installed in a mh and powered by either the shoreline or the genset.  This mystery charger would charge my coach batteries at variable rates so as to get the quickest, healthiest charge without cooking them.  I would appreciate it if someone could post the name or item number of that charger. If someone has other suggestions, I would appreciate hearing them. Don MacCluskie

Response:

Some time ago someone in this ng posted a Camping World charger name and item number that could be permanently installed in a mh and powered by either the shoreline or the genset.  This mystery charger would charge my coach batteries at variable rates so as to get the quickest, healthiest charge without cooking them.  I would appreciate it if someone could post the name or item number of that charger.

It’s a 45-amp upgrade to any converter in the standard Magnetek 6300 series, called the 7345RU (“RU” = “replacement upgrade”). It slides in and replaces the bottom half of your converter. It costs somewhere around $200, and I installed it myself with pliers and screwdriver in about an hour and a half, without hurrying at all. Clear wiring directions are included. No problem. Seems to do what they say it will do. And, according to the tech service rep I talked to, you can leave your MH plugged in to shore power forever, as long as you check your batteries periodically for a dead cell. Best wishes. GB in NC [For e-mail reply, please remove the last two letters from "yahoooo."]

Response:

Today I subscribed to sci.chem.electrochem.battery. There is nothing there for us.  I’ll download it and read it for a couple of weeks, if anything interesting to us RV people comes up I’ll alert this newgroup. BillM37401

Response:

It has been my experience that you can leave your RV connected to ’shore’ power and _FORGET_ about the battery.  That is as long as you have a proper power supply / charger combination. evergreen solar pv panel

the problem with your advice, Herman, is that precious few RV’s HAVE “proper power supply/charger combinations”.  Certainly there are exceptions but if readers have the usual junk that is supplied by MOST manufacturers, you may be sure the battery will be cooked.  I use and recommend an ordinary 24-hour timer (under ten bucks) to switch the ac power on for maybe an hour each day.  Much cheaper than the good but very expensive switching battery chargers you refer to as “proper”.

Response:

It has been my experience that you can leave your RV connected to ’shore’ power and _FORGET_ about the battery.  That is as long as you have a proper power supply / charger combination.  I’ve gone up to a couple of years with offshore ‘marine’ batteries as used in RVs (deep cycle) under constant charge.  When they were needed it allowed us several hours to get out there and a couple of more hours to repair the problem.  Still ran a 10 amp load for about 6 hours. As far as on an RV, currently mine has been docked for about 14 days, constant charging with onboard regulation is in use.  The battery is about 6 months old, and I expect to get about another 30 months life out of it.  No bubbling, no ‘hot’ battery, etc. When the battery voltage gets below 12.5 volts for more than 30 minutes the charging circuit kicks in.  If current drain is more than 5 amps, hi-charge kicks in, otherwise trickle to full (Vb13.6 for 10 minutes and current is <0.5 amps for same time period). If any one is interested contact me by Email and I’ll provide you with info on how to obtain this device that I use.   Either contact me direct or my sales office: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Others have said that the battery chargers in RV power converters are notoriously lousy. My experience agrees: Last winter my trailer had not been out for several months, so I plugged in the cord to top up the battery. I forgot it for a day or so and when I went out there, I could hear the battery bubbling, which means overcharging. The voltage was way too high (almost 15 Volts as I recall) I hope it didn’t harm it too much.  Now, if I need to charge it unattended, I use a car battery charger. I can recommend the one I have which is a Schumacher 10 Amp Automatic. It stops charging at just about the ideal voltage- 14.2 Volts. It then goes into a mode where it pulses on and off every few seconds. I never hear any rapid bubbling in any batterys when  it charges them. Mike Madden Not necessarily the opinion of Amdahl Corp. BTW: Is there any adjustment for the battery charger inside these built in power converters? Mine is made by Magnetek.

evergreen solar pv panel

Others have said that the battery chargers in RV power converters are notoriously lousy. My experience agrees: Last winter my trailer had not been out for several months, so I plugged in the cord to top up the battery. I forgot it for a day or so and when I went out there, I could hear the battery bubbling, which means overcharging. The voltage was way too high (almost 15 Volts as I recall) I hope it didn’t harm it too much.   Now, if I need to charge it unattended, I use a car battery charger. I can recommend the one I have which is a Schumacher 10 Amp Automatic. It stops charging at just about the ideal voltage- 14.2 Volts. It then goes into a mode where it pulses on and off every few seconds. I never hear any rapid bubbling in any batterys when  it charges them. Mike Madden Not necessarily the opinion of Amdahl Corp. BTW: Is there any adjustment for the battery charger inside these built in power converters? evergreen solar pv panel

Response:

In watching the writings in this newsgroup as regards battery charging it appears that inverter have substantially better and more intelligent battery charging sections that converters (or so I read it.) Any thoughts out there??? Thanks Alex

What you want to look for is a properly designed three stage charger. Heart makes absolutely excellent inverters with built-in chargers. I use a 1000 watt model with built-in 50 amp charger (Freedom 10) Aboard my 40′ trawler yacht. Theres also a 2000 watt/ 110 amp charger model (Freedom 20). Our new Alpenlite 5er will have this option installed. Chargers from low end stores as you described will certainly be junk. The heart units are available from Camping World or most marine stores. e-mail me if you have additional questions. I’m an electronics engineer. Malcolm Oakes K6UAW

Response:

In watching the writings in this newsgroup as regards battery charging it appears that inverter have substantially better and more intelligent battery charging sections that converters (or so I read it.)   My question:  Do the “automatic” battery chargers available at K-Mart, Wal Mart, Whitney, etc. do a better job of charging batteries than the converters.  It seems that that would be a more reasonable price to pay for proper charging than the inverters, if you don’t need the 110V from your batteries that an inverter provides. Any thoughts out there??? evergreen solar pv panel

Response:

Question vermont solar laminate pv panel about solar charging

Question:

Alhough itvermont solar laminate pv panel;s true that one of those little trickle charge units will never overcharge a battery, it is quite easy to overcharge a battery with a larger solar panel.  That’s what charge controllers are for.vermont solar laminate pv panel

: :I just bought a 94 Flair up in Phoenix  and it came with one of those chargers :mounted on the AC unit.  One thing about using solar is that you can not :o vercharge the battery as long as the sun goes down each night. vermont solar laminate pv panel

Response:

I notice my new JC Whitney catalog has a small 12V solar charging panel that’s weatherproof and will not overcharge the battery for the grand price of $39.95. This sounds like a wonderful add-on.  But if it’s so great, why don’t RV mfgs include it as a standard thing (I mean, ONLY $40 bucks!)  I remember the battery draining was a major worry w/ our 5th wheel too (I know, it charges from truck when running, but if parked for a week we had to be frugal). Question is…do these things really work?  I have a pop-up and this sounds like such a good idea…even for keeping battery up in winter. vermont solar laminate pv panel

It depends on what you expect from it: A good discussion of the various options in solar power (from an RVers standpoint) can be found at: http://www.hcampers.com/articles/lel02.html Dave David Keeney Happy Campers – Your RV Travel Guide to SW US & N Mexico http://www.hcampers.com

Response:

I This sounds like a wonderful add-on.  But if it’s so great, why don’t RV mfgs include it as a standard thing (I mean, ONLY $40 bucks!)  I remember the battery draining was a major worry w/ our 5th wheel too (I know, it charges from truck when running, but if parked for a week we had to be frugal).

I just bought a 94 Flair up in Phoenix  and it came with one of those chargers mounted on the AC unit.  One thing about using solar is that you can not overcharge the battery as long as the sun goes down each night. Anne

Response:

vermont solar laminate pv panel

I notice my new JC Whitney catalog has a small 12V solar charging panel that’s  weatherproof and will not overcharge the battery for the grand price of  $39.95. This sounds like a wonderful add-on.  But if it’s so great, why don’t RV mfgs  include it as a standard thing (I mean, ONLY $40 bucks!)  I remember the  battery draining was a major worry w/ our 5th wheel too (I know, it charges  from truck when running, but if parked for a week we had to be frugal). Question is…do these things really work?  I have a pop-up and this sounds  like such a good idea…even for keeping battery up in winter. Gayle

Go for it . but don’t expect to much out of this charger it probably charges at less than .5 of an amp and at this rate the battery will be 2 yrs old before it is charged. these small panels don’t even have the capacity to over charge a 12vdc batt. perhaps with a nucular blast it will produce a bit more but it will only keep up with about the same draw as a radio memory drain. Rodneyvermont solar laminate pv panel

Response:

I notice my new JC Whitney catalog has a small 12V solar charging panel that’s  weatherproof and will not overcharge the battery for the grand price of  $39.95. This sounds like a wonderful add-on.  But if it’s so great, why don’t RV mfgs  include it as a standard thing (I mean, ONLY $40 bucks!)

Our 95 Bounder, which is definitely the low price spread, although of good quality for the money,  did come with a small solar panel, specifically for the chassis battery. As to why any given RV does or not have a solar panel, it is like everything else.  There is an immense menu of things that any manufacturer could incorporate into his design, but $39.95 here, $20 there and $70 somewhere else and we’d all be driving or pulling $300K palaces.  Some of the worthwhile (at least worthwhile to me) goodies would probably have an installed cost to the RV manufacturer less than half of what it would cost to do aftermarket.  But because of the circular nature of the thing, we go back to the RV being unaffordable if all the gee whiz things were added. The solar panel is a real benefit to RVs whose shorelines feed into a converter and downline devices which does not charge the chassis battery or who must store their RV where a shoreline is not available. — RV Club R-Char-00134  GS Life 205497  TTN  RPI  CCC    FMCA F85268     Bounders United 4618    Bounders of America 1250    Escapees 44893   SMART 7666

Response:

This sounds like a wonderful add-on.  But if it’s so great, why don’t RV mfgs include it as a standard thing (I mean, ONLY $40 bucks!)  I remember the battery draining was a major worry w/ our 5th wheel too (I know, it charges from truck when running, but if parked for a week we had to be frugal). Question is…do these things really work? vermont solar laminate pv panel I have a pop-up and this sounds like such a good idea…even for keeping battery up in winter.

Yes, solar panels do work.  But you get what you pay for.  The smaller, inexpensive panels do not have very much charging power. But if all you want to do is keep up a charge in cold weather in a car that it helps.  I found that for a trailer where one uses electricity to run lights and other things a more expensive more powerful solar panel helps to maintain enough of a battery charge in my rig so I can be at a campsite without electricity for three weeks and not hook the trailer up to the car for recharging.  It is important to keep the solar panel in the sun as much as possible.  Mine is not attached to the trailer.  It is connected to the electricity  near the 12v fridge line and I have it on a long lead so I can place it where the sun is.  By the way, when I am not hooked up to electricity I  only use flourescent lights. They give a lot more light for less battery drain

Response:

vermont solar laminate pv panel This sounds like a wonderful add-on.  But if it’s so great, why don’t RV mfgs include it as a standard thing (I mean, ONLY $40 bucks!)  I remember the battery draining was a major worry w/ our 5th wheel too (I know, it charges from truck when running, but if parked for a week we had to be frugal). Question is…do these things really work?  I have a pop-up and this sounds like such a good idea…even for keeping battery up in winter. Yes, solar panels do work.  But you get what you pay for.  The smaller, inexpensive panels do not have very much charging power. But if all you want to do is keep up a charge in cold weather in a car that it helps.  I found that for a trailer where one uses electricity to run lights and other things a more expensive more powerful solar panel helps to maintain enough of a battery charge in my rig so I can be at a campsite without electricity for three weeks and not hook the trailer up to the car for recharging.  It is important to keep the solar panel in the sun as much as possible.  Mine is not attached to the trailer.  It is connected to the electricity  near the 12v fridge line and I have it on a long lead so I can place it where the sun is.  By the way, when I am not hooked up to electricity I  only use flourescent lights. They give a lot more light for less battery drain

There definitely is no danger of overcharge!  I saw one family in a 460 – powered class c at a campground.  They had run ALL the batteries dead, and had a solar panel, about 6 inches square, sitting on the hood with number 18 wires and alligator clips attached to two big batteries, patiently waiting for the batteries to come up enough to start the 460. I loaned them jumper cables. bill miller

Response:

I notice my new JC Whitney catalog has a small 12V solar charging panel that’s  weatherproof and will not overcharge the battery for the grand price of  $39.95. This sounds like a wonderful add-on.  But if it’s so great, why don’t RV mfgs  include it as a standard thing (I mean, ONLY $40 bucks!)  I remember the  battery draining was a major worry w/ our 5th wheel too (I know, it charges  from truck when running, but if parked for a week we had to be frugal). Question is…do these things really work?  I have a pop-up and this sounds  like such a good idea. vermont solar laminate pv panel..even for keeping battery up in winter. vermont solar laminate pv panel

Response:

Serious solar power questions (long) sanyo solar pv panel

Question:

to Neon (Practically Perfect) John’s blanket condemnation of solar power,sanyo solar pv panel  and aside from noting that it doesn’t take much to make the latter look silly, I won’t try to help Steve finish the job. But having some experience poking around in the alternate energy arena and trying to avoid being found amongst the loonier elements I offer some strongly held opinions that MIGHT be of interest to rv travelers generally: 1. So far, nobody has devised really cost-effective alternates to the power grid, assuming you have a cord long enough to plug in. Get that truth in yer head.  $$$ matter to all rational people. 2. Virtually all alternate sources tend to be situation-limited.  Solar panels to sunny climes, wind machines to windy ones, water power to dependable streams, wave/tide power to beaches, methane production to large herds, etc ad nauseum. 3. To varying degrees, the “free” sources are cyclic and/or intermittent and therefore create the need for power storage. To date, batteries are the most effective means of storing electrical energy… and at the risk of seeming to agree with Neon John I must admit they are inefficient and sorely limited. 4. For people who can afford the cost, space, and aggravation and who understand and accept the limitations, most of the alternate power schemes *can* reduce (or in unusual extreme cases) eliminate dependence on public power. 5. For the rv traveler, ONLY solar has very wide appeal, and it is only practical for a limited number of folks who live/travel in sunny climates, and/or who shun shade like the plague.  Investment in larger PV panels & controls CAN extend – perhaps even indefinitely – a generator-free stay in a sunny place, provided you are adequately frugal with power. We do not see any personal justification for solar, in view of where, when and how we travel.  But despite the hype from all sides, solar power is (about the only really viable alternate (non-generator) power source for rv travelers. Isanyo solar pv panel

Response:

Self-regulating promo?  WTF?  I used my battery maintainer (a device almost 3 ft long by 18″ wide and fully regulated via an external shunt regulator – hardly a toy.) as a convenient example because that is the only panel I now own, not being fool enough to get burned on solar twice. sanyo solar pv panel

Your panel is thus about 0.4 square meters. If rated at a 17V output, that would make it a 17W panel with a solar efficiency of 1.7%. You got TOOK John! Must be the experimental low-efficiency model.  I tried to go self-sufficient back in the 70s when government subsidy money flowed in great rivers.sanyo solar pv panel  I was not willing to adopt an austere lifestyle and thus found the concept impractical even though I literally had a roof full of panels.

So you are telling us you invested thousands of dollars coating your roof with PV technology, investing more thousands in a huge battery bank, certainly a power transfer switch to sell excess back to the utility, and you never considered your lavish life-style ahead of time? Come on, John, that sounds pretty impetuous to me – not the meticulously careful driver who can determine his fate on the road regardless of destiny and careless motorists! Ah, now we get to the crux of the problem – another one of those SoCal types who forgets that the rest of the world isn’t like SoCal.  The graphic at http://www.etaengineering.com/resources/insolus.html graphically illustrates the irrelevance of SoCal results to the rest of the country.sanyo solar pv panel  This graphic shows that SoCal gets nearly the highest solar influx of any area in the US.  SoCal gets over 3 times the amount of solar energy as New England and over twice as much as we get here.

Well, it’s encouraging that you now admit that there might be ONE area of the country where solar is a viable option. Could it be you are guilty of a slight hyperbole? Ok, let’s look at the chart. I am located and do most of my camping in the ‘orange’ zone. Someone in the ‘green’ zone would receive half the yearly insolation we do. If we lived there, we could get by as well with four panels instead of two. That is what this chart is for. I.e., solar would work as well or better as our system for about 1/3 of this country, and useable in about 90% of the country – according to ‘your’ chart. Let’s do some calcs using the figures from the above illustration. sanyo solar pv panel  I am biased heavily against solar.  I went through the solar stage back in the 70s.  It was impractical back then for anyone other than the stary-eyed zealots.  The only thing that has changed is that the current crop of panels are a bit more efficient.  Not enough difference to overcome all the other practical problems.  One of the biggest problems you’ll run into is that much of what you hear or read about solar is more wistful pining than fact.  The reason is solar is the darling of the environmental wing where most things are based on beliefs rather than fact.

<snip the rest of the hot air on solar. Solar power is an excellent choice for keeping batteries charged up under the right conditions. You’ll find few other than John who have bad experiences with this choice. A 1-Amp self-regulating promo item is a poor example for making a judgement on viability. Dismissing those who have had great success and satisfaction from their solar setups as basing their judgement on belief rather than fact is odd. In any event, PV panels DO require paying attention to their main requirement, which is full, unobstructed sunlight as much of the time as possible. If this is doable, then they will provide an impressively long lifetime of virtually maintenance-free and silent power, which does not consume any on-board resources. The panels are rated at ‘one sun’ from directly overhead, at 25C measured at the panel. This gives a laboratory standard useful for comparing panels, but does not reflect actual use conditions. For reference, our 3A panels actually produce from 1.5A to 2.8A when the sun is at its zenith – the variance due to season (SoCal). They are mounted flat on the roof. For winter use, or at northern latitudes, a tilting arrangement while camped would greatly improve the output. It would also add siting orientation as an important requirement, though. When camped in full sun – certainly not always possible – we have never run short of power with our setup. We use fans, lights, TV, VCP, etc, conservatively – but not obsessively so. We also have been careful to shift the power use away from the batteries as possible. E.g. most of our heating is with a small catalytic heater. No matter how vast your on-board resources, though, eventually you will need water, LP, or to dump. Balancing the battery-charging setup with these other constraints is certainly feasible for many with solar-power.sanyo solar pv panel

Response:

We have two siemens 100 watt panels and four trojan GC batteries. With the panels mounted flat we see about 30-35 amp hours a day into our batteries in arizona in the winter, about the same in montana in the summer. Tilting the panels in the summer has minimal benefit from our meter readings, about 25% more power in the winter by tilting. Long term solar seems to work, some friends are on their third or fourth RV with the same panels, most have swapped controllers along the way as the newer computerized ones give a better charge. We only have a 300 watt inverter to run the computer or the TV and can usually live comfortably on solar and get 3-4 hours of TV a night out of it. Once the batteries reach the trickle charge state you can directly use the excess power from the cells without drawing down the batteries. I watch the green light on the controller and when it comes on so does the computer! We are having some difficulty in deciding what to do regarding power needs while we are on the road and are hoping that you could share your experiences and ideas with us. Our goal is to live comfortable for a year with out running the generator all the time. Since we are a long ways off in the number of years before retirement our trip will be limited to about a year. At which time we will be selling the motorhome so resale value is a factor (it’s a 34′ 1991 Gulfstream). During our year we plan on mostly “boondocking” to keep expenses low, etc… At the same time we are gear nuts, TV, stereo, dvd movies, computer, etc, etc, etc… After adding up what I think our daily amp hr consumption might be I keep ending up with about 90 amp hrs daily.sanyo solar pv panel  The guy at the solar store seems to think this is a lot but it adds up when I use the charts.

<snip Proofreading Service — Please review the terms & fees for processing unsolicited commercial e-mail before submitting your e-mail for processing. Fees are available at:  www.primenet.com/~katta/fees.html

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -We are having some difficulty in deciding what to do regarding power needs while we are on the road and are hoping that you could share your experiences and ideas with us. Our goal is to live comfortable for a year with out running the generator all the time. Since we are a long ways off in the number of years before retirement our trip will be limited to about a year. At which time we will be selling the motorhome so resale value is a factor (it’s a 34′ 1991 Gulfstream). During our year we plan on mostly “boondocking” to keep expenses low, etc… At the same time we are gear nuts, TV, stereo, dvd movies, computer, etc, etc, etc… After adding up what I think our daily amp hr consumption might be I keep ending up with about 90 amp hrs daily. The guy at the solar store seems to think this is a lot but it adds up when I use the charts. Anyway here is a list of what we are looking at for our “system”. 2- AP 120 panels (14.2 amps/hr) at price of $650 each 1- Solaris 24 charge controller with battery temp sensing, $129 4- Trojan T-105 batteries $300 This system I’m told should yield around 80 amp hrs a day with 6 hours of good sunlight. So lets say that we start off with a  fully charged battery bank of 440 amp hrs and if I’m understanding correctly we never want to drain below 50% so we have 220 amp hrs to use. Lets say that we are using 90 amp hrs a day but putting back 80 through the solar panels, so really we are eating up the 220 held in the battery bank by going in the hole 10 amp hrs a day. Correct? 220 divided by 10 = 22 so with this line of thought we could go for 22 days before we needed to recharge with shore power or start up the generator. Is this thinking sound???? If so, it is surprising how much difference one vs.. two panels makes. one panel would yield around 40 amp hrs which would put us almost 50 amp hrs in the hole each day, which in turn would only allow a little over 4 days before the battery bank dropped below the magical 50% mark. Big difference! Like anything and everything we need to access the value of the second $650 panel to our lifestyle. But one question that may help is in regards to charging the battery bank back up with the generator. We have a Onan 5K watt generator. sanyo solar pv panel This among other things is where I’m still quite confused. Can you in fact charge the battery bank off the generator? If so how would you go about calculating the charge rate? Or maybe the easy answer I’m looking for is, an hour of generator time puts about  X amp hrs in to the battery bank. Would the inverter/charger apply to this scenario? The inverter/charger we are looking at is the Heart interface Freedom Combi 2000 watts, 12 DC volts, 120AC volts, 100A charge rate (off of shore power I’m assuming). We are also looking at the Link 1000 control panel to go with the inverter/charger. This is another area that has me confused (duh). The manual states the charge rate (3 step)  is at 14.2 volts for 1 hour then it drops to 13.2 volts for the float charge. How can I calculate the amount of time it would take to put, let’s say 200 amp hrs back into the battery bank? Any and all help is greatly appreciated. I’m always more comfortable hearing from people who have experience rather than take a salesman’s word for something. Thanks, JB

If the sun shines all day every day, no clouds, no rain, this might work, but there are two sides to the coin:  on hot days, no AC, on rainy days no hot water unless you’re on propane, altogether a step up from camping, but not very high up.  I boondock quite often, run the genset for heavy duty stuff, and the 2500 Heart for ‘most everything else.sanyo solar pv panel  It works for me, because I went from philosophical to practical to pragmatic as soon as I hit the road.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – If you’re going to drag a toad around, there is another very satisfactory option.  Put half your house batteries in your toad. When you drive the toad, the battery is charged by the toad’s alternator.  When you return to the RV, you plug the toad’s house battery into the RV using an Anderson connector (aka “forklift battery connector”) and some welding cable.  When the toad is being towed, the Anderson connector is plugged in to keep the toad’s house battery charged.  An added benefit is that you’ll never be out in the toad with a dead battery!  Another nifty thing is, once you have the Anderson connector installed, jumper cables consist of little more than another Anderson connector, a bit of cable and a couple of clips.  Handy when you need to boost someone ELSE, of course sanyo solar pv panel  You can buy the Anderson Connectors from Waytek Inc, 800 328-2724. Just an observation here.. in the next paragraph you cite your reasoning for not having a multi-tude of batteries in your coach.. possible fire hazard and weight (possibly reducing mileage) …  Well I don’t know where you intend to put these extra coach batteries in the tow but it looks like to me more wiring means more chance for electrical problems.

Separating the house battery into two banks has absolutely nothing to do with how big the battery is.  If I pulled a toad, I’d put one battery in the toad and one in the motorhome.  Still have my 300 amp-hours, only split across two vehicles.  In all my 4 wheel vehicles, the batteries are all located in the trunks where I moved them to.  Yields better handling, longer life from the more benign environment and frees up a hole in the engine compartment where a couple of quarts of oil or whatnot can be stored.  Plus I can use a big honking (technical term) deep discharge battery that wouldn’t fit in the engine compartment. If I had a toad, the house battery would go right beside the cranking battery in the trunk.  If the wiring is done correctly, that is, the battery in a sealed battery box with the cables taken directly through the trunk floor and run along the frame rails or ribs, then there is nothing in the vicinity of the wiring or battery to burn even if a short occurs.  Compare that to the (often lack of) “battery boxes” in many RVs. It ain’t gonna make much difference in the weight department. The combo weight is going to be the same  (motor-home and tow).

But the weight’s in the toad, riding on the toad’s tires which likely offer less rolling resistance than the MH’s truck tires.  If the MH is at its GVW as mine is, that could make some difference.   The largest benefit, of course, remains that the house battery can be charged while the toad is driven. sanyo solar pv panel  Gary One other comment before I go.  Though a lot of people put huge batteries in their RVs, I’m uncomfortable with that configuration for a number of reasons.  The primary concern is the fire hazard. Having hundreds of amp-hours of battery capacity sitting there just one short circuit away is a recipe for a bad and persistent fire, as Bob Evans reported here a couple of weeks ago.  A big battery can keep a shorted wire glowing hot enough to kindle fire for a long  time regardless of how much water or extinguishing agent you pour on it.  Yes, proper fusing and wiring can mitigate the risk but if I can do the job without all that potential energy sitting there, so much the better.  The other consideration is weight.  Perhaps more so for me than you because my rig is at its weight limit now.  But even if the rig can handle the weight, it decreases mileage, increases the rate of tire wear and impairs the performance of the vehicle.  The effects are perhaps small, but if I can do the job without the weight, wsanyo solar pv panel .  Well I don’t know where you intend to put these extra coach batteries in the tow but it looks like to me more wiring means more chance for electrical problems.  It ain’t gonna make much difference in the weight department. The combo weight is going to be the same  (motor-home and tow). Just my view… Gary One other comment before I go.  Though a lot of people put huge batteries in their RVs, I’m uncomfortable with that configuration for a number of reasons.  The primary concern is the fire hazard. Having hundreds of amp-hours of battery capacity sitting there just one short circuit away is a recipe for a bad and persistent fire, as Bob Evans reported here a couple of weeks ago.  A big battery can keep a shorted wire glowing hot enough to kindle fire for a long

time regardless of how much water or extinguishing agent you pour on – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – it.  Yes, proper fusing and wiring can mitigate the risk but if I can do the job without all that potential energy sitting there, so much the better.  The other consideration is weight.  Perhaps more so for me than you because my rig is at its weight limit now.  But even if the rig can handle the weight, it decreases mileage, increases the rate of tire wear and impairs the performance of the vehicle.  The effects are perhaps small, but if I can do the job without the weight, why not?sanyo solar pv panel

Dave There was an article some time ago in FMCA magazine (years ago) about a gentleman who set up a solar array on his motorhome.. He spent extended time in AZ in the winter as I remember.. He used solar and wind.  He had all the info about what it cost and how much it produced.  It was “real life” as opposed to some of the opinions expressed here.. His goal was to be self-sufficient electrically… He was learning as he went.. GRIN.. One thing is that in his case it appeared that most of the figures he got from the solar sales people were not really accurate… It appears that they tend to under-estimate the needs of a rv.. He lists all items in his rig. (ice-maker,puter,stereo, etc )   up till the last article he wrote he was not self -sufficient yet but very close.. This setup for me would not be real practical as I don’t set still more than a day or two.. Our rig is all electric and I don’t think that we could ever install enough panels unless we hooked up a trailer.. (GRIN)… As far as solar or wind power are concerned, a good alternative source of power.. It may not pay for itself in the near term, but like you said, the panels are not likely to wear out.. I have a friend in Montana that has a PV array on his home. Without going into much detail, he figures a payback in 11.3 years at today’s energy cost, quicker if the rates go up and I suppose longer if they go down.. Then he will just be selling power to the power grid. (which he does now when he gets things fully charged) There is one poster that runs on like he knows quite a bit on just about everything, but don’t believe all you read.. He has been proven wrong in many cases and in one case the consequences could be very electrifying or the arcing could start a fire and according to the NEC not even legal in dwellings to be occupied… I like to call them “jack of all trades, master of none” …  He isn’t always wrong and does have some very good posts… Just my opinion…sanyo solar pv panel

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Good questions.  I await more learned answers than I can give (and I don’t have my solar books here).  But I already have bought 3 K120’s and plan a similar system to yours.  3 versus 2 panels, as it gives much more solar charging and I hope to not have to use a generator except in a real sunless spell. Consider that the panels are good for 25 or more years as they never wear out.  So they are like gold almost and should have a good resale value, separate from the MH. sanyo solar pv panel

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – First, my bias.  I am biased heavily against solar.  I went through the solar stage back in the 70s.  It was impractical back then for anyone other than the stary-eyed zealots.  The only thing that has changed is that the current crop of panels are a bit more efficient.  Not enough difference to overcome all the other practical problems.  One of the biggest problems you’ll run into is that much of what you hear or read about solar is more wistful pining than fact.  The reason is solar is the darling of the environmental wing where most things are based on beliefs rather than fact. <snip the rest of the hot air on solar.

Let’s see if it is hot air. Solar power is an excellent choice for keeping batteries charged up under the right conditions. You’ll find few other than John who have bad experiences with this choice. A 1-Amp self-regulating promo item is a poor example for making a judgement on viability. Dismissing those who have had great success and satisfaction from their solar setups as basing their judgement on belief rather than fact is odd.

Self-regulating promo?  WTF?  I used my battery maintainer (a device almost 3 ft long by 18″ wide and fully regulated via an external shunt regulator – hardly a toy.) as a convenient example because that is the only panel I now own, not being fool enough to get burned on solar twice.  I tried to go self-sufficient back in the 70s when government subsidy money flowed in great rivers.  I was not willing to adopt an austere lifestyle and thus found the concept impractical even though I literally had a roof full of panels. In any event, PV panels DO require paying attention to their main requirement, which is full, unobstructed sunlight as much of the time as possible. If this is doable, then they will provide an impressively long lifetime of virtually maintenance-free and silent power, which does not consume any on-board resources. The panels are rated at ‘one sun’ from directly overhead, at 25C measured at the panel. This gives a laboratory standard useful for comparing panels, but does not reflect actual use conditions. For reference, our 3A panels actually produce from 1.5A to 2.8A when the sun is at its zenith – the variance due to season (SoCal). They are mounted flat on the roof. For winter use, or at northern latitudes, a tilting arrangement while camped would greatly improve the output. It would also add siting orientation as an important requirement, sanyo solar pv panel

Ah, now we get to the crux of the problem – another one of those SoCal types who forgets that the rest of the world isn’t like SoCal.  The graphic at http://www.etaengineering.com/resources/insolus.html graphically illustrates the irrelevance of SoCal results to the rest of the country.  This graphic shows that SoCal gets nearly the highest solar influx of any area in the US.  SoCal gets over 3 times the amount of solar energy as New England and over twice as much as we get here. Let’s do some calcs using the figures from the above illustration. At http://www.eren.doe.gov/power/pdfs/pv_concentrators.pdf there is an interesting DOE report on the state of the art on utility-grade PVs.  In the tables, it is noted that the state of the art PVs are capable of 23% conversion efficiency when unaided by any concentrator.  Consumer cells aren’t as good so let’s round to 20% Here in Tennessee, we get an AVERAGE of 3000 watt-hours per square meter per day.  Tossing away 80% of that, there is 600 watt-hours/sq meter/day available.  At 12 volts, that would be 50 amp-hours/sq meter/day.  Scanning the net, it appears that PV panels run 600-800 dollars per sq meter.  That’s pretty expensive electricity. More importantly, it’s not much electricity at all.   It is important to note that the figures in the above illustration are computed for a surface optimally aimed at the sun.  If the panel is laying flat, the the output is reduced by the cosine of the angle between optimal and flat.  It is also important to note that those numbers are AVERAGE.  The daily variance from average is large. Here in Tennessee, where one can go for a week at a time with heavy overcast, the average doesn’t matter much when your batteries are flat. Steve, glad that solar works for you in the SoCal desert. Fortunately for the rest of us, the rest of the US has slightly more varied and interesting terrain.  Unfortunately (at least for the solar proponents), the available solar energy varies at least as much. Hmm, looks like the hot air is cooling rapidly….sanyo solar pv panel

Response:

We are having some difficulty in deciding what to do regarding power needs while we are on the road and are hoping that you could share your experiences and ideas with us. Our goal is to live comfortable for a year with out running the generator all the time.

First, my bias.  I am biased heavily against solar.  I went through the solar stage back in the 70s.  It was impractical back then for anyone other than the stary-eyed zealots.  The only thing that has changed is that the current crop of panels are a bit more efficient.  Not enough difference to overcome all the other practical problems.  One of the biggest problems you’ll run into is that much of what you hear or read about solar is more wistful pining than fact.  The reason is solar is the darling of the environmental wing where most things are based on beliefs rather than fact.  I’ll outline some examples as we go. I’m going to assume that you really mean that you want to be comfortable in your travels.  To me, comfort includes not having to worry about every amp-hour (or every ounce of water or propane, for that matter.)  It also includes being hassle-free.  Now if you LIKE futzing around with your power system to keep it working well during your travels, then your definition of comfort may be different than mine. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Since we are a long ways off in the number of years before retirement our trip will be limited to about a year. At which time we will be selling the motorhome so resale value is a factor (it’s a 34′ 1991 Gulfstream). During our year we plan on mostly “boondocking” to keep expenses low, etc… At the same time we are gear nuts, TV, stereo, dvd movies, computer, etc, etc, etc… After adding up what I think our daily amp hr consumption might be I keep ending up with about 90 amp hrs daily. The guy at the solar store seems to think this is a lot but it adds up when I use the charts. Anyway here is a list of what we are looking at for our “system”. 2- AP 120 panels (14.2 amps/hr) at price of $650 each 1- Solaris 24 charge controller with battery temp sensing, $129 4- Trojan T-105 batteries $300 This system I’m told should yield around 80 amp hrs a day with 6 hours of good sunlight. So lets say that we start off with a  fully charged battery bank of 440 amp hrs and if I’m understanding correctly we never want to drain below 50% so we have 220 amp hrs to use. Lets say that we are using 90 amp hrs a day but putting back 80 through the solar panels, so really we are eating up the 220 held in the battery bank by going in the hole 10 amp hrs a day. Correct? 220 divided by 10 = 22 so with this line of thought we could go for 22 days before we needed to recharge with shore power or start up the generator. Is this thinking sound???? If so, it is surprising how much difference one vs.. two panels makes. one panel would yield around 40 amp hrs which would put us almost 50 amp hrs in the hole each day, which in turn would only allow a little over 4 days before the battery bank dropped below the magical 50% mark. Big difference!

OK, here’s the first series of solar myths and problems.  The first thing you have to do is look at what the specs really mean.  Solar panel specs tend to be wildly optimistic.  For example, I have an Arco (now Siemens) panel I used to keep the battery charged on one of my catering trucks (I own a restaurant, among other things.)  It volts.  In reality it produces about 20 volts open circuited but when an amp is drawn, it loads down to about 13 volts. This panel will indeed produce an amp of current – in the summer noon-day sun with the panel angled optimally toward the south.  On a cloudy winter day with the panel laying flat on the roof of the truck, it makes only about 100 ma.  In the winter with the sun low on the horizon all day, even on a cloudless day, it’s production is less than 400 ma.  Yes, it could do a bit better if the panel was angled toward the sun but then we’re back to daily futzing again.   Let’s take a look at the math.  (If you go to http://www.altonet.com/~solarpv/01index.htm and download the Acrobat catalog file, you’ll find a design guide that has a lot more details than this post.)  You calculate the amp-hours by multiplying the amps the solar panel supplies times the hours of illumination.  In your example above, you assume that you will achieve almost the peak output for 6 hours a day.  This might be true in the summer in the south but it will NOT be possible any other time and in any other location.  Based on my measurements here in Tennessee, I’d probably cut that by at least a third for an annual average.  Even more when evaluating a short period of time, say, the month of January with the panels laying flat on the roof of the RV. The next problem you have is that you assume the entire power output of the panel goes to charging the batteries.  This is not the case. Up to 10% of the charging current is dissipated as heat in the battery and does not contribute to the charge.  You must take that into account when you’re figuring out how much usable energy will be deposited in the battery by the solar panels. There is one error in your model that helps you.  That is, assuming only a 50% discharge.sanyo solar pv panel   This is a popular myth in this newsgroup but there is no basis for it, particularly for the Trojan batteries you plan to buy.  If you go to http://www.trojanbattery.com/technical%20assist/faqs/charging.htm, you will find the following text: “Trojan’s deep cycle lead acid batteries can be cycled to any percentage of their rated capacity and then be recharged. However, Trojan does recommend that you never cycle below 80% of the battery

Best type thin film solar pv panel of solar panels

Question:

I have heard impressive thin film solar pv panel claims for both the single crystal type of solar panel (eg Siemens SP75) and the amorphous/thin film type of solar panel (eg, Unisolar US64). By the way, both types are listed in the West catalog. The single crystal type seems to offer higher efficiency and a proven track record whereas the relative newcomer, amorphous type claims insensitivity to shadowing. On a sailboat, the insensitivity to shadowing would seem to be very valuable, but I have not spoken to any cruisers who have experienced the difference! Comments or feedback would be appreciated. thin film solar pv panel

Response:

Solar panels of thin film solar pv panel either type thin film solar pv panel can be built to be insensitive to partial shadowing. The builder has to incorporate a diode on each string of cells. It cost more and loose a bit of power. Ask for the details sheet or better do the part shadow test to be sure.thin film solar pv panel

Solar-powered anchor ligh solar pv panel insallation

Question:

My buddy and I played around with this idea, especially the mechanism for turning the regular anchor light at the top of the mast on and off at dusk and dawn.solar pv panel  insallation  He was the electronics whiz, but we blew up transistors and such for several days before we finally got a circuit to work.   Anyway, the whole time this was going on I was wondering about taking the control panel and appropriate relays out of a busted up VCR and making a “programmable” anchor light.  On our bay, you could probably get away with running the anchor light on Friday and Saturday night only.solar pv panel  insallation  Has anyone tried to monkey with this aspect of the problem? BTW, my buddy finally put one of those solar-powered patio lights on the bow pulpit.   We are back to our “designated anchorage” now, so the issue is mostly moot. Good luck!solar pv panel  insallation  BSSure you would.  That way you don’t have to break out of a sound BSslumber at daybreak to turn off the anchor light so you don’t run down BSthe ship’s battery.  You can always have a main breaker to keep the BSanchor light from coming on at a dock at night. Aha!… good point, and one which I hadn’t considered; but now that you’ve illustrated such a marvelously damn-good reason,solar pv panel  insallation  I just might be looking into this idea myself! <g BSBut more importantly, when the boat is left for days or weeks at a BStime on a mooring in an area that is NOT designated as a special BSFurthermore, I was looking for an inexpensive solution that would be BSindependant of the boat’s main battery system, so that if the anchor BSlight did manage to run down its battery, the engine could still be BSstarted.  Unfortunately, good simple solutions are hard to find, or BSelse too expensive. Good points.  How about two (2) batteries and have one (1) of them dedicated to the anchor light?  An inexpensive solar-panel to top it up throughout the day should do the trick…solar pv panel  insallation

Response:

: Good points.  How about two (2) batteries and have one (1) of them : dedicated to the anchor light?  An inexpensive solar-panel to top it up : throughout the day should do the trick… I just saw a 5-watt solar : panel up here in Toronto for $85 (Cdn) so it should only be about $50 in : the States! Let’s do a little math here.  A 5-watt panel will put out maybe a third of an amp.  Assume a 5-hour average charging day, optimistically, and an anchor light which draws half an amp, and you get three hours of light per night.  Clearly inadequate.solar pv panel  insallation  To guarantee enough power to drive a light during twelve hours of darkness in the winter with overcast days, I’d want at least a 20-watt panel, though 30 would be better.  Now you are talking $400 bucks, with a charge-controller, assuming you don’t need to buy an extra battery. Whoever said there are no simple, cheap solutions had it right.solar pv panel  insallation

Response:

Bill: BSSure you would.  That way you don’t have to break out of a sound BSslumber at daybreak to turn off the anchor light so you don’t run down BSthe ship’s battery.solar pv panel  insallation  You can always have a main breaker to keep the BSanchor light from coming on at a dock at night. Aha!… good point, and one which I hadn’t considered; but now that you’ve illustrated such a marvelously damn-good reason,solar pv panel  insallation I just might be looking into this idea myself! <g BSBut more importantly, when the boat is left for days or weeks at a BStime on a mooring in an area that is NOT designated as a special BSFurthermore, I was looking for an inexpensive solution that would be BSindependant of the boat’s main battery system, so that if the anchor BSlight did manage to run down its battery, the engine could still be BSstarted.  Unfortunately, good simple solutions are hard to find, or BSelse too expensive. Good points.  How about two (2) batteries and have one (1) of them dedicated to the anchor light?  An inexpensive solar-panel to top it up throughout the day should do the trick… I just saw a 5-watt solar panel up here in Toronto for $85 (Cdn) so it should only be about $50 in the States! solar pv panel  insallation

Response:

Need advice for building an energy system solar pv panel size

Question:

Hi, I’ve been reading these newsgroups for a while and really enjoy the info. I’m trying to build a system that is made up of many types of generators, i.e. Wind, solar, hydro.  I purchased a Bergey 10kw Excel that has the grid tie inverter and was thinking about using a Compaq UPS M2200 – UPS – 2200 VA – 220 volt inverter with it.  I’m still in the planning stages of this project and need advice/comments on what can and can’t be done.solar pv panel size  This will be an off grid project. Some of the ideas that I was thinking about were using the excess energy to heat up a large 10,000 gallon tank of water for winter heating/hot water and/or producing hydrogen for cooking. I know that this is vague but I just wanted to throw some info out to get some feedback. solar pv panel size

Response:

Hi, I purchased a Bergey 10kw Excel that has the grid tie inverter and was thinking about using a Compaq UPS M2200 – UPS – 2200 VA – 220 volt inverter with it.  I’m still in the planning stages of this project and need advice/comments on what can and can’t be done.  This will be an off grid project. solar pv panel size

Why did you get the grid-tie inverter if this is an off-grid project? I have a Bergey XL but have the battery charging model with dual Trace SW5548’s and a 48V/1640AH bank of Surrette 8CS25P flooded lead-acid batteries. If the wind doesn’t blow enough during the summer, I’d consider adding PV. I have no source for hydro unless someone comes up with a residential sized unit that can harness the tides.solar pv panel size

Response:

The grid tie was part of the wind generator that I purchased.  It was a steal at the price I purchased it at.  I suppose I could go to Bergey and exchange the grid tie for an off grid version since I’m in Oklahoma anyway. I do intend to include PV in this system as well. As for an inverter, the cost of the Trace and other are very high compared to the cost of the UPS inverter.  The larger ones are true sine, I’m just concerned whether they will hold up over the long run.solar pv panel sizei, I purchased a Bergey 10kw Excel that has the grid tie inverter and was thinking about using a Compaq UPS M2200 – UPS – 2200 VA – 220 volt inverter with it.  I’m still in the planning stages of this project and need advice/comments on what can and can’t be done.  This will be an off grid project. Why did you get the grid-tie inverter if this is an off-grid project? I have a Bergey XL but have the battery charging model with dual Trace SW5548’s and a 48V/1640AH bank of Surrette 8CS25P flooded lead-acid batteries. If the wind doesn’t blow enough during the summer, I’d consider adding PV. I have no source for hydro unless someone comes up with a residential sized unit that can harness the tides solar pv panel size.

Response:

the cost of the trace system is well worth the price.I have installed quite a few system similar to yours and trace is for the most part bullet proof….don’t get to carried away with the size of your water tank your heating…you might not warm 10,000 gal but a degree or two…smaller the better..just two cents worth of experience..tom.. www.angelfire.com/wa2/solarshop

solar pv panel size The grid tie was part of the wind generator that I purchased.  It was a steal at the price I purchased it at.  I suppose I could go to Bergey and exchange the grid tie for an off grid version since I’m in Oklahoma anyway. I do intend to include PV in this system as well. As for an inverter, the cost of the Trace and other are very high compared to the cost of the UPS inverter.  The larger ones are true sine, I’m just concerned whether they will hold up over the long run. Ral Hi, I purchased a Bergey 10kw Excel that has the grid tie inverter and was thinking about using a Compaq UPS M2200 – UPS – 2200 VA – 220 volt inverter with it.  I’m still in the planning stages of this project and need advice/comments on what can and can’t be done.  This will be an off grid project. Why did you get the grid-tie inverter if this is an off-grid project? I have a Bergey XL but have the battery charging model with dual Trace SW5548’s and a 48V/1640AH bank of Surrette 8CS25P flooded lead-acid batteries. If the wind doesn’t blow enough during the summer, I’d consider adding PV. I have no source for hydro unless someone comes up with a residential sized unit that can harness the tides.solar pv panel size

Response:

As for the water, I intended to use a solar/glycol panel to heat the water year round, the electric heater was to be used only as way to ensure excess energy would be diverted and used when needed.  This would be a concrete tank with some type of rock installed to absorb the heat and retain it.  I already have a pond planned for summer cooling, ie geothermal hydronics and thought this would be a good way to ensure winter heating. One of my real questions is: since the Bergey grid tie inverter requires power to be on the line to sync with, will a low VA/Watt inverter be enough to fool the inverter into believing that it is connected to the grid and/or is this a good idea? Ral – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – the cost of the trace system is well worth the price.I have installed quite a few system similar to yours and trace is for the most part bullet proof….don’t get to carried away with the size of your water tank your heating…you might not warm 10,000 gal but a degree or two…smaller the better..just two cents worth of experience..tom.. www.angelfire.com/wa2/solarshop The grid tie was part of the wind generator that I purchased.  It was a steal at the price I purchased it at.  I suppose I could go to Bergey and exchange the grid tie for an off grid version since I’m in Oklahoma anyway. I do intend to include PV in this system as well. As for an inverter, the cost of the Trace and other are very high compared to the cost of the UPS inverter.  The larger ones are true sine, I’m just concerned whether they will hold up over the long run. Ral Hi, I purchased a Bergey 10kw Excel that has the grid tie inverter and was thinking about using a Compaq UPS M2200 – UPS – 2200 VA – 220 volt inverter with it.  I’m still in the planning stages of this project and need advice/comments on what can and can’t be done.  This will be an off grid project. Why did you get the grid-tie inverter if this is an off-grid project? I have a Bergey XL but have the battery charging model with dual Trace SW5548’s and a 48V/1640AH bank of Surrette 8CS25P flooded lead-acid batteries. If the wind doesn’t blow enough during the summer, I’d consider adding PV. I have no source for hydro unless someone comes up with a residential sized unit that can harness the tides.solar pv panel size

Response:

…This would be a concrete tank with some type of rock installed to absorb the heat and retain it.

You are looking for some type of rock that has more heat capacity than water by volumesolar pv panel size

Response:

I must admit that I’ve not done enough research on the water heating issue.  I do already have the solar water panels, pump and exchange water tank.  I read an article many years past (I’ll have to find it) that explained the dynamics of storing the heat in water and rock for use in home heating.  Hence the thoughts of using rock and water. My real question concerns the inverters!solar pv panel size  …This would be a concrete tank with some type of rock installed to absorb the heat and retain it. You are looking for some type of rock that has more heat capacity than water by volume? solar pv panel size

Response:

The grid tie was part of the wind generator that I purchased.  It was a steal at the price I purchased it at.  I suppose I could go to Bergey and exchange the grid tie for an off grid version since I’m in Oklahoma anyway.

It sure can’t hurt to talk to one of the people at the factory.  I’d start with Steve Wilke.  They’re selling a lot of units for California, so they may well have a need for the grid-tied version and be willing to make you a deal. I do intend to include PV in this system as well. As for an inverter, the cost of the Trace and other are very high compared to the cost of the UPS inverter.  The larger ones are true sine, I’m just concerned whether they will hold up over the long run.

My understanding is that the Trace inverters are pretty reliable.  (I have two, as I mentioned).  Try www.altenergystore.com  for good pricing.  Their programmable relays could also be set up to control your excess power diversion.  They can also be set up to automatically start a backup fossil fuel generator, if needed.solar pv panel size

Response:

Water stores way more heat than rock per pound and I think per square foot up to about 100C, where water starts boiling. The advantage of rock is that it can be heated hotter (and of course it is solid, so the storage container cannot collapse if you forget and drive a tractor rig over the top of it). You can store heat energy at 500C or so in rock, in order to use it to drive a heat engine/heat pump. The hotter you store the heat, the smaller your storage volume has to be, but the faster the heat is lost through the insulation. A balance suggests that long term storage might best be done with water at near boiling and a heat engine/heat pump cycle except where it is very cold outside. I did the calculations to verify that a 10 foot diameter cylinder about 10 feet deep, with about a foot of a good quality insulation around the water tank, and a second outside tank to keep the insulation dry, could in principal store enough heat energy to supply a house for 3-4 months. Making this kind of thing work well and keeping the price reasonable needs some experience, but at least the physics seems to be OK. By the way, the reason to use 100C water, more than just to store more heat, is that having near a 75C temperature difference between the storage and the house permits you to run a heat motor (a sterling, or a low temperature steam engine of some sort), and this would let you have both electric power and the energy to run a heat pump and draw in 3-5 times the amount of heat that you have to draw from your storage. In effect this would increase the effectiveness of your stored heat as much as doubling or more the size of the storage. (The exact advantage depends on how long the storage stays hot enough to run the motor efficiently, and how cold it is outside. When it is more than about 30 degrees C colder outside than inside, the heat pump gain goes down rapidly and this becomes less valuable. For the Seattle area, where we keep our inside house at 63f and outside is typically around 45-50f during the time we need heat (which is really most of the fall, spring, and winter), it should work very well.) If you deliver heat to the tank from the top (or basically at the point where the water temperature is just barely colder than the incoming water), the tank will be striated with the hottest water at the top, and the bottom quite cold. This has the maximum heat energy for your system and you want to withdraw energy so as to keep it this way. So you run a heat engine from the hot top, to the cool house, then use it to run a heat pump and suck heat from the bottom of the tank or outside (which ever is hotter) into the house. If you have cloudy mild days, a plate style collector can heat the bottom of the tank,solar pv panel size  and when it is clear, a collector with a modest focus gain could provide near boiling water for the top of the collector. If you have a high gain collector, say 500C, then you can drive a high temperature heat engine between the real hot oil or air, and the water near boiling at the top of the tank and then run a heat pump to suck low temperature heat from outside, or the bottom of the tank if you have a lot of low quality heat there and it is really cold outside, and pump that in to your hot water level. All you need to do the put heat in and keep the tank striated is to control the circulation so convection currents do not get to suck cold water into the flow and mix the levels. Around our place this year we are having a very bad water shortage. Suddenly making a large cistern like this makes sense, even if it is only to store the winter rain.

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I must admit that I’ve not done enough research on the water heating issue.  I do already have the solar water panels, pump and exchange water tank.  I read an article many years past (I’ll have to find it) that explained the dynamics of storing the heat in water and rock for use in home heating.  Hence the thoughts of using rock and water. My real question concerns the inverters! Ral …This would be a concrete tank with some type of rock installed to absorb the heat and retain it. You are looking for some type of rock that has more heat capacity than water by volume?solar pv panel size

Response:

Water stores way more heat than rock per pound and I think per square foot

Per cubic foot, nitwit. solar pv panel size

Response:

Nick. I know that. Are you this rude with all your acquaintances, or is it just me?

solar pv panel size Water stores way more heat than rock per pound and I think per square foot Per cubic foot, nitwit. Nick

Response:

Are you this rude with all your acquaintances, or is it just me?

I don’t suffer fools gladly, Fred, and find most of your postings a waste of time. You often post nonsense, and seem to ignore practicalities, as in “some sort of Stirling engine.” We need more details. Consider the Carnot efficiency and magnitude of energy flows in the heat pump scheme you described…solar pv panel size

Response:

Hi: I suggest going with a 24 volt system. There is a super wind generator that can be hooked up to the main battery bank and the excess going to heat water. 10,000 gallons of water is a LOT of water, you might consider something closer to “normal”. There are a lot of web sites that will give you a lot of good information about alternative energy and how to set it all up. My house was set up with the bare minimum. After I fried two wind generators that had built in regulators, I finally ordered one without the built in regulator (also called a brake), and simply run the wind generator through an isolater that charges two banks at the same time. If you want to sell your excess power, you want to set it up as a 24 volt system. And use a true sine wave inverter. Trace makes a good one. The only reason I even mention Trace is because they back their products. To the point of rebuilding a regulator (that was given to me) for free (I paid the shipping). Which says a lot for a company…. Cathy – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, I’ve been reading these newsgroups for a while and really enjoy the info. I’m trying to build a system that is made up of many types of generators, i.e. Wind, solar, hydro.  I purchased a Bergey 10kw Excel that has the grid tie inverter and was thinking about using a Compaq UPS M2200 – UPS – 2200 VA – 220 volt inverter with it.  I’m still in the planning stages of this project and need advice/comments on what can and can’t be done.  This will be an off grid project. Some of the ideas that I was thinking about were using the excess energy to heat up a large 10,000 gallon tank of water for winter heating/hot water and/or producing hydrogen for cooking. I know that this is vague but I just wanted to throw some info out to get some feedback.solar pv panel size

Response:

Are you this rude with all your acquaintances, or is it just me? I don’t suffer fools gladly, Fred, and find most of your postings a waste of time.

Somewhere around adolescence more of us learn that no matter how much book learning we have, it’s not worth much if we’re nasty, condescending folks who use our learning to browbeat others. Unfortunately, Nick hasn’t learned that, and after one tantrum too many he has earned a spot in my killfile. There are plenty of folks who can do math and give informed answers; we don’t need the nasty ones. — Start-Up Education, P.O.Box 7072, Pueblo West, Colorado, 81007 USA   Find out about Start-Up Education: solar pv panel size

Response:

Are you this rude with all your acquaintances, or is it just me? I don’t suffer fools gladly, Fred, and find most of your postings a waste of time.

More specifically, I find most of Fred’s “solutions” frustrating. They remind me of that cartoon with the scientist and the blackboard covered with equations and a little box at the bottom that says “then a miracle happens”solar pv panel size Unfocused brainstorming. I’ve also noticed his fondness for nuclear power and the big business approach, aka Boeing. He claims to be a physicist, but often has trouble spelling that…solar pv panel size Somewhere around adolescence more of us learn that no matter how much book learning we have, it’s not worth much if we’re nasty, condescending folks who use our learning to browbeat others.

Some do, some don’t. They are often allowed to  choose  their behavior. Unfortunately, Nick hasn’t learned that, and after one tantrum too many he has earned a spot in my killfile…

How nice to have the last word. You may be showing some arrogance and condescension here too, and a desire to control the behavior of others. There are plenty of folks who can do math and give informed answers; we don’t need the nasty ones.

And a belief that everyone shares your beliefs. Speak for yourself, Ellen solar pv panel size

Response:

Dear dear nick. I suffer fools gladly, since they are the only kind of people on this planet. There are a lot of folk working with sterling and steam engines. Were I to get specific it would literally take over the list. If you need more details, I suggest spending a bit of time with any of the hundred web sites for those interested. This idea has been developed to the point where basic design issues can now be developed a bit. The penultimate question is not if it is an idea of any possible merit, or a waste of time, but if it can be made to work practically. This involves choosing the right heat pump, Stirling or steam engine for the job. That a heat pump will provide a gain in effectiveness is proved by those who use em to improve their bottom line electric bill. Modifying one to do this job is as simple as choosing one that works with the house you are in and using an alternator to drive it’s AC motor. This is probably more efficient than a shaft and transmission drive, though not as good as a unit designed to run off a single shaft. I believe that we can take the process a step at a time without falling flat on our faces, and each step provides some items of value. The heat storage tank is a simple large scale thermal cistern. In fact, I thought it was your comment regarding this idea that convinced me it was worth thinking about. I had not imagined that a reasonable sized tank could store enough hot water to keep a house warm for months. The stirling/steam engine chosen needs a bit of work. I have a pretty good grip on the thermodynamics of the beast, but actually picking one off the line that can operate efficiently with a 50-70 C temperature difference is not so easy. The stirling can probably do it. The low temperature OTEC turbines designed to use the 30C temperature difference between the deep ocean and surface water show that it can be done, but not how best to do it for a household. Most of the moderate sized steam engines I have found operate with greater than 100C temperature differences, although there is no hard natural limit to lowering this using vacuum or a lower boiling temperature fluid. While some experimental stirling engines have been run on temperature differences as low as 2-3C, practical engines in the power level and temperature range we want do not seem to be readily available. I would say we have some modest design development to do. I had hoped that some one with some practical experience here might already know of a suitable engine for this application. It is pretty clear that the pistons need to be larger than for a higher temperature difference. The Carnot efficiency is set by the temperature difference Nick. This is why a heat pump works great only if the temperature difference is not too great. I am not sure what you mean by “energy flow”. The heat flow is as I described, from hot side, to motor to house. The mechanical energy from the motor drives the heat pump (with an alternator, electric motor taking the place of a shaft if convenient.). and then the heat flows from outside (or from a warm storage area) to the heat pump to the house. We give up a bit of efficiency converting the heat into energy by using the relatively warm house as the cold side for the heat engine, but we get to use 100% of the reject heat to do the job we need done. Power levels are on the order of those we are burning to provide heat for the house as it stands, if the heat is electric. For a typical house this ought to be on the order of 10KW of total heat input I think, so the motor needs to be about 5-10 HP.solar pv panel size  (I am assuming gain from the heat pump here.) Nick. I am a physicist. Minor gaffs aside, I have a fair grasp of the thermodynamics we are dealing with. Practical experience I have almost none. In any case, if we are going to invent a better way to do it, we need to go beyond what is now practical to what can be made to be practical. So if you know of some practical reason that would make this concept impossible to bring to fruition, great, let’s hear it. Otherwise I need help figuring out how to make it practical.  Perhaps one of our buds here likes to play with steam engines and is willing to try modifying one to run off this kind of low temperature difference heat?

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Are you this rude with all your acquaintances, or is it just me? I don’t suffer fools gladly, Fred, and find most of your postings a waste of time. You often post nonsense, and seem to ignore practicalities, as in “some sort of Stirling engine.” We need more details. Consider the Carnot efficiency and magnitude of energy flows in the heat pump scheme you described..solar pv panel size

Response:

There are a lot of folk working with sterling and steam engines. Were I to get specific it would literally take over the list…

Go ahead Fred solar pv panel sizeLet’s see some brand names and numbers… If you need more details, I suggest spending a bit of time with any of the hundred web sites for those interested.

Any particular hundred?solar pv panel size …The penultimate question is not if it is an idea of any possible merit, or a waste of time, but if it can be made to work practically.

You might say that determines its merit. …That a heat pump will provide a gain in effectiveness is proved by those who use em to improve their bottom line electric bill. Modifying one to do this job is as simple as choosing one that works with the house you are in and using an alternator to drive it’s AC motor.

As simple as that. You’ve glossed over the heat-to-motion part again. …The stirling/steam engine chosen needs a bit of work.

Agreed. (Have you chosen one, then?) I have a pretty good grip on the thermodynamics of the beast, but actually picking one off the line that can operate efficiently with a 50-70 C temperature difference is not so easy. The stirling can probably do it.

Do what?solar pv panel size  The low temperature OTEC turbines designed to use the 30C temperature difference between the deep ocean and surface water show that it can be done, but not how best to do it for a household.

Show what can be done? How much power do these turbines make, at what efficiency? How big are they, and what do they cost? They seem to have minimal relevance, if they don’t show how “it” can be done for a household. …practical engines in the power level and temperature range we want do not seem to be readily available. I would say we have some modest design development to do.

I’d say there’s lots to do, mainly in raising development money :-) Some describe this as chickens and eggs. Good Stirling engines do not exist, so there’s no market for them, and nobody wants to develop one, since nobody wants to buy any. Some people say thermoacoustic engines are cheaper, with piezoelectric elements and almost the same (low) efficiency. They want to build them into oil furnaces to power the blowers (with a much higher temp heat source.) The Carnot efficiency is set by the temperature difference…

So you’d start with 60/(273+60), ie 18%, and go downhill from there, with a real engine. Say 5% overall heat-to-motion? I am not sure what you mean by “energy flow”…

As I understand your description, you suggest using a solar hot water heat source, with the house as a cold sink, for some mythical Stirling engine which turns an alternator shaft which provides electricity for a heat pump which helps heat the house… Would this also provide all the electricity the house needs in the winter? Or would that come from some mysterious but inexpensive photovoltaic house paint? …Power levels are on the order of those we are burning to provide heat for the house as it stands, if the heat is electric. For a typical house this ought to be on the order of 10KW of total heat input I think, so the motor needs to be about 5-10 HP. (I am assuming gain from the heat pump here.)

Care to explain this with some more details and numbers?solar pv panel size

Response:

The following link details the rock, water, phase change salts heat storage tradeoffs.     solar pv panel size  Dear dear nick. I suffer fools gladly, since they are the only kind of people on this planet. There are a lot of folk working with sterling and steam engines. Were I to get specific it would literally take over the list. If you need more details, I suggest spending a bit of time with any of the hundred web sites for those interested. This idea has been developed to the point where basic design issues can now be developed a bit. The penultimate question is not if it is an idea of any possible merit, or a waste of time, but if it can be made to work practically. This involves choosing the right heat pump, Stirling or steam engine for the job. That a heat pump will provide a gain in effectiveness is proved by those who use em to improve their bottom line electric bill. Modifying one to do this job is as simple as choosing one that works with the house you are in and using an alternator to drive it’s AC motor. This is probably more efficient than a shaft and transmission drive, though not as good as a unit designed to run off a single shaft. I believe that we can take the process a step at a time without falling flat on our faces, and each step provides some items of value. The heat storage tank is a simple large scale thermal cistern. In fact, I thought it was your comment regarding this idea that convinced me it was worth thinking about. I had not imagined that a reasonable sized tank could store enough hot water to keep a house warm for months. The stirling/steam engine chosen needs a bit of work. I have a pretty good grip on the thermodynamics of the beast, but actually picking one off the line that can operate efficiently with a 50-70 C temperature difference is not so easy. The stirling can probably do it. The low temperature OTEC turbines designed to use the 30C temperature difference between the deep ocean and surface water show that it can be done, but not how best to do it for a household. Most of the moderate sized steam engines I have found operate with greater than 100C temperature differences, although there is no hard natural limit to lowering this using vacuum or a lower boiling temperature fluid. While some experimental stirling engines have been run on temperature differences as low as 2-3C, practical engines in the power level and temperature range we want do not seem to be readily available. I would say we have some modest design development to do. I had hoped that some one with some practical experience here might already know of a suitable engine for this application. It is pretty clear that the pistons need to be larger than for a higher temperature difference. The Carnot efficiency is set by the temperature difference Nick. This is why a heat pump works great only if the temperature difference is not too great. I am not sure what you mean by “energy flow”. The heat flow is as I described, from hot side, to motor to house. The mechanical energy from the motor drives the heat pump (with an alternator, electric motor taking the place of a shaft if convenient.). and then the heat flows from outside (or from a warm storage area) to the heat pump to the house. We give up a bit of efficiency converting the heat into energy by using the relatively warm house as the cold side for the heat engine, but we get to use 100% of the reject heat to do the job we need done. Power levels are on the order of those we are burning to provide heat for the house as it stands, if the heat is electric. For a typical house this ought to be on the order of 10KW of total heat input I think, so the motor needs to be about 5-10 HP. (I am assuming gain from the heat pump here.) Nick. I am a physicist. Minor gaffs aside, I have a fair grasp of the thermodynamics we are dealing with. Practical experience I have almost none. In any case, if we are going to invent a better way to do it, we need to go beyond what is now practical to what can be made to be practical. So if you know of some practical reason that would make this concept impossible to bring to fruition, great, let’s hear it. Otherwise I need help figuring out how to make it practical.  Perhaps one of our buds here likes to play with steam engines and is willing to try modifying one to run off this kind of low temperature difference heat? Are you this rude with all your acquaintances, or is it just me? I don’t suffer fools gladly, Fred, and find most of your postings a waste of time. You often post nonsense, and seem to ignore practicalities, as in “some sort of Stirling engine.” We need more details. Consider the Carnot efficiency and magnitude of energy flows in the heat pump scheme you described..solar pv panel size

Response:

Comments interspersed

… I’ve also noticed his fondness for nuclear power and the big business approach, aka Boeing. He claims to be a physicist, but often has trouble spelling that.. solar pv panel size

I see you have not been inducted into our secrets. At risk of being blackballed, I will let you in. We have a test, administered usually in the 2nd year of college. If the student can understand thermodynamics, but has no trouble spelling, we try to get them to take up engineering. If they are so excited about the idea they just can’t slow down enough to spel rite, then we know, these are the ones we want. If you failed the test the first time, just remember to misspell a few words here and there, just as long as you do not confuse the Gibs Free Energy with perpetual motion. (It’s a physics joke.)

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Comments interspersed … I’ve also noticed his fondness for nuclear power and the big business approach, aka Boeing. He claims to be a physicist, but often has trouble spelling that…solar pv panel size I see you have not been inducted into our secrets. At risk of being blackballed, I will let you in. We have a test, administered usually in the 2nd year of college. If the student can understand thermodynamics, but has no trouble spelling, we try to get them to take up engineering. If they are so excited about the idea they just can’t slow down enough to spel rite, then we know, these are the ones we want. If you failed the test the first time, just remember to misspell a few words here and there, just as long as you do not confuse the Gibs Free Energy with perpetual motion. solar pv panel size

So that is why all the stuff you write in Word has so many red underlines in it…

Response:

Go ahead Fred solar pv panel size Let’s see some brand names and numbers…

You need a 5-10 HP motor to run from 90-100C hot to about 25C cold. From my general parusal there are a few custom jobs, probably rather expensive, in the 2-3 HP range, most of them taylored for somewhat hotter input than this. Solstice for example shows a unit that is installed at the focus of a large solar mirror. Problem is, most of these places do not make these engines as a standard off the shelf item. I suspect there are just not enough folk to buy them at this time. I do not anticipate, at this time, that I would want to buy the unit if I could find a supplier. Too expensive. However, it is not that hard to build something like this, like I said, in principal. Shoot Stirling did it over 100 years ago, so it should be pretty easy for a good mechanic. If you were waiting for someone to step up and give you a brand name and number you are waiting till someone else does all the work for you. If you need more details, I suggest spending a bit of time with any of the hundred web sites for those interested. Any particular hundred?solar pv panel size

Just ask your web browser to go find Stirling Motors. Nevertheless, here are a few I checked on. There are about 30 others that I have visited, and a few hundred that my browser came up with that I have not visited.solar pv panel size  In most of these cases we are dealing with a large professional lab reporting on a heavily funded NASA or some such level study. Great info, but not someone we can order a home unit from, or a model outfit with stuff way under a KW. As I said, we need some development in our particular area of need, and a standard product that can be manufactured in large enough quantities to obtain some benifit of scale. Doing it yourself seems quite reasonable, but not for everyone. Modifying one to do this job is as simple as choosing one that works with the house you are in and using an alternator to drive it’s AC motor. As simple as that. You’ve glossed over the heat-to-motion part again.

We were talking about the problem in sections. The heat pump section of this puzzle can be dealt with quite independently. The little motor that makes it go can be driven by a more or less standard generator, or replaced entirely if you can reach it and connected by drive shaft to the motor we are laboring over. There is no technical issue here that requires more than hacksaw level modifications at most. Actually producing clean 60Hz AC for it may be a good idea because we could use it for the rest of the house anyway. But the details are just details. There is no hidden physics here to catch you up and even my rather limited mechanical abilities should not be strained too much. …The stirling/steam engine chosen needs a bit of work. Agreed. (Have you chosen one, then?)

No. Not at all. I have about 4 basic ideas with only the vaguest idea of which would work best. I can run a standard steam engine, pulling a vacuum on the cold side. This will permit the hot side to boil down to a temperature as low as freezing. The only  problem is the gas density, and thus the available work, becomes smaller the colder the hot side gets, and of course  vacuums tend to leak and would have to be sucked down regularly. This means large pistons, and vacuum tight connections. I can use a low boiling material. An alcohol would work OK, or even butane. I can circulate the hot/cold water right up to the engine, so the pressurized butane would only be a gallon or so, and relativly easy to keep tight, but still, who wants hot butane in the house. Amonia, perhaps, but almost as dangerous. There may be some nice secondary vessles that would make this kind of engine safe enough. As an alternative to a couple square foot of piston, a turbine might be usefull. I like the Tesla turbine, for it’s simplicity, but I still haven’t found anyone with much practical experience working with the conditions we want to work with. I debate the stirling engine. A good high efficiency engine but it is right at the edge of my skill limits to build. And I need to make a pretty big one for this task. I have been trying to come up with a variation that would be easier to build, but would still work well. I will let you know if I can get it to work. Do what?

Operate at a temp dif of 50C and produce 5 HP at least, in a package that I can build without borrowing an NC milling machine and a thousand bucks worth of custom milled stainless. The low temperature OTEC turbines designed to use the 30C temperature difference between the deep ocean and surface water show that it can be done, but not how best to do it for a household. Show what can be done? How much power do these turbines make, at what efficiency? How big are they, and what do they cost? They seem to have minimal relevance, if they don’t show how “it” can be done for a household.

Let’s put it this way. They are experamental, so cost is mostly irrelevant. The cost includes someone like me cogitating on how to design the thing, and someone like you telling us it can’t be done, on top of the cost of actually making this one of a kind. They do show that the thermodynamics works as expected, and that a large unit (I think the demo was only a few hundred KW, small for a city, but a bit large for a home) can be made efficient enough to make practical power from only a 30C delta. The relavance is that it may be possible to scale the plant down and make a system that will work. What is not at all clear is whether after the scaling down the system will cost less than half a million or not. If they did not work, there would be no reason to try. Since they did, it makes a good deal of sense to try. After all, we have almost twice the temperature delta and a lot of really bright back yard machinests. We just need to get em started in the right direction.  Now, what way was that again? … The Carnot efficiency is set by the temperature difference… So you’d start with 60/(273+60), ie 18%, and go downhill from there, with a real engine. Say 5% overall heat-to-motion?

OK. Let me draw this more clearly. The heat engine, without losses, puts all the input heat into either output heat or energy. Due to the very high efficiency of a generator/motor, we will ignore for the moment the relatively small losses in moving from mechanical to electrical and back. The heat pump is exactly the same but reversed. The ratio of input heat to output energy and vice verse, is a larger number when the temperature difference is lower. That is, if the temperature difference is small, you get little energy out, but you do not have to put much energy in either. The outside will be assumed to be around 5-10C, the house around 25C, and the source about 90C. I get about 21% for the hot stage heat to energy. The cold stage however only takes about 7% to pump the same heat into the house. The overall gain then is a factor of 3.8. For every BTU we suck from the 90C tank, we suck 2.8 from the outside. This advantage goes up rapidly if the outside temp is warmer than 5C, but also goes down fast if it is much colder . Friction losses and leakage blows hell out of this estimate, so we have to make pretty good motors and pumps or we just won’t get the performance. However, it should be possible to get a 80-90% thermodynamic  efficiency (that is the % of the peak carnot efficiency of the “perfect” heat engine) with a motor as large as 5-10 HP, at least I think that is reasonable. A nice compact little turbine? Well, that is the point. Not enough work in this area. But the thermodynamics and some close data points suggest that we may be able to develop this system with a bit of work. BTW, there is a lot of energy in this tank. We could certainly use it to generate a lot of electric power without impacting it’s operation as heat source for the house much. The home heating demand is really large compared to a couple of lights here and there. Well, my vision for this system is a complete thermal and electrical management and storage system, to provide home heating, hot water, and refrigeration, with a minimum of waste. I think that is a good idea,solar hot water heaters pennsylvsnia  but it is going to take some development for sure.

Response:

There are a lot of folk working with sterling and steam engines. Were I to get specific it would literally take over the list. If you need more details, I suggest spending a bit of time with any of the hundred web sites for those interested. This idea has been developed to the point where basic design issues can now be developed a bit. The penultimate question is not if it is an idea of any possible merit, or a waste of time, but if it can be made to work practically. This involves choosing the right heat pump, Stirling or steam engine for the job. solar hot water heaters pennsylvsnia

Pardon my ignorance here, but is there any information/merit to a Nitinol (“Memory Metal”) engine? I’ve seen rudimentary example designs, but don’t recall seeing anything ‘developed’. Dorsai

Response:

There are a lot of folk working with sterling and steam engines. Were I to get specific it would literally take over the list. If you need more details, I suggest spending a bit of time with any of the hundred web sites for those interested.

solar hot water heaters pennsylvsnia  The heat storage tank is a simple large scale thermal cistern. In fact, I thought it was your comment regarding this idea that convinced me it was worth thinking about. I had not imagined that a reasonable sized tank could store enough hot water to keep a house warm for months. The stirling/steam engine chosen needs a bit of work. I have a pretty good grip on the thermodynamics of the beast, but actually picking one off the line that can operate efficiently with a 50-70 C temperature difference is not so easy. The stirling can probably do it. . Most of the moderate sized steam engines I have found operate with greater than 100C temperature differences, although there is no hard natural limit to lowering this using vacuum or a lower boiling temperature fluid. While some experimental stirling engines have been run on temperature differences as low as 2-3C, practical engines in the power level and temperature range we want do not seem to be readily available. I would say we have some modest design development to do. Snip In any case, if we are going to invent a better way to do it, we need to go beyond what is now practical to what can be made to be practical.

Response:

Somewhere around adolescence more of us learn that no matter how much book learning we have, it’s not worth much if we’re nasty, condescending folks who use our learning to browbeat others.

And some of us, after learning that one lesson, continue to learn.  We learn it really doesn’t matter how anyone phrases their speech, but it is important that the facts be correct and either well understood or explicity stated.  This is extremely helpful when interacting with people who have different values and perspectives than one’s self. And finally, something that most people seem to learn eventually, is that coddling fools and whiners wastes time and energy and does nobody any good.  Why should they be allowed to misguide anyone else?  They need to be straightened out, and it makes no sense to mince words.  Call a spade a spade and be done with it.  If people are grown up enough to deal with real life and the hard knocks that brings, what’s a few words? Like it or lump it. Oh, and Nick…  Keep on keeping an eye on my math, please! sdb — Evidently some sorry coward was offended by one of my posts. The wuss was too scared to speak out in public.  Poor baby…  *** More guns means less crime.  ISBN:0-226-49363-6  *** Watch out for munged e-mail address. User should be  sdbUse1  and host is  at  bigfoot.com Do NOT send me unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE)!

Response:

I’m not sure how much energy it would take to heat 10,000 gallons to near boiling, but I’m fairly sure it would take alot more energy than solar can provide. The sun don’t shine 24/7. My two bits Dragonfly – solar hot water heaters pennsylvsnia  Go ahead Fred :-) Let’s see some brand names and numbers… You need a 5-10 HP motor to run from 90-100C hot to about 25C cold. From my general parusal there are a few custom jobs, probably rather expensive, in the 2-3 HP range, most of them taylored for somewhat hotter input than this. Solstice for example shows a unit that is installed at the focus of a large solar mirror. Problem is, most of these places do not make these engines as a standard off the shelf item. I suspect there are just not enough folk to buy them at this time. I do not anticipate, at this time, that I would want to buy the unit if I could find a supplier. Too expensive. However, it is not that hard to build something like this, like I said, in principal. Shoot Stirling did it over 100 years ago, so it should be pretty easy for a good mechanic. If you were waiting for someone to step up and give you a brand name and number you are waiting till someone else does all the work for you. If you need more details, I suggest spending a bit of time with any of the hundred web sites for those interested. Any particular hundred? :-) Just ask your web browser to go find Stirling Motors. Nevertheless, here are a few I checked on. There are about 30 others that I have visited, and a few hundred that my browser came up with that I have not visited. www.stirlingengine.com hsolar hot water heaters pennsylvsniasolar hot water heaters pennsylvsnia. Great info, but not someone we can order a home unit from, or a model outfit with stuff way under a KW. As I said, we need some development in our particular area of need, and a standard product that can be manufactured in large enough quantities to obtain some benifit of scale. Doing it yourself seems quite reasonable, but not for everyone. Modifying one to do this job is as simple as choosing one that works with the house you are in and using an alternator to drive it’s AC motor. As simple as that. You’ve glossed over the heat-to-motion part again. We were talking about the problem in sections. The heat pump section of this puzzle can be dealt with quite independently. The little motor that makes it go can be driven by a more or less standard generator, or replaced entirely if you can reach it and connected by drive shaft to the motor we are laboring over. There is no technical issue here that requires more than hacksaw level modifications at most. Actually producing clean 60Hz AC for it may be a good idea because we could use it for the rest of the house anyway. But the details are just details. There is no hidden physics here to catch you up and even my rather limited mechanical abilities should not be strained too much. …The stirling/steam engine chosen needs a bit of work. Agreed. (Have you chosen one, then?) No. Not at all. I have about 4 basic ideas with only the vaguest idea of which would work best. I can run a standard steam engine, pulling a vacuum on the cold side. This will permit the hot side to boil down to a temperature as low as freezing. The only  problem is the gas density, and thus the available work, becomes smaller the colder the hot side gets, and of course  vacuums tend to leak and would have to be sucked down regularly. This means large pistons, and vacuum tight connections. I can use a low boiling material. An alcohol would work OK, or even butane. I can circulate the hot/cold water right up to the engine, so the pressurized butane would only be a gallon or so, and relativly easy to keep tight, but still, who wants hot butane in the house. Amonia, perhaps, but almost as dangerous. There may be some nice secondary vessles that would make this kind of engine safe enough. As an alternative to a couple square foot of piston, a turbine might be usefull. I like the Tesla turbine, for it’s simplicity, but I still haven’t found anyone with much practical experience working with the conditions we want to work with. I debate the stirling engine. A good high efficiency engine but it is right at the edge of my skill limits to build. And I need to make a pretty big one for this task. I have been trying to come up with a variation that would be easier to build, but would still work well. I will let you know if I can get it to work. Do what? :-) Operate at a temp dif of 50C and produce 5 HP at least, in a package that I can build without borrowing an NC milling machine and a thousand bucks worth of custom milled stainless. The low temperature OTEC turbines designed to use the 30C temperature difference between the deep ocean and surface water show that it can be done, but not how best to do it for a household. Show what can be done? How much power do these turbines make, at what efficiency? How big are they, and what do they cost? They seem to have minimal relevance, if they don’t show how “it” can be done for a household. Let’s put it this way. They are experamental, so cost is mostly irrelevant. The cost includes someone like me cogitating on how to design the thing, and someone like you telling us it can’t be done, on top of the cost of actually making this one of a kind. They do show that the thermodynamics works as expected, and that a large unit (I think the demo was only a few hundred KW, small for a city, but a bit large for a home) can be made efficient enough to make practical power from only a 30C delta. The relavance is that it may be possible to scale the plant down and make a system that will work. What is not at all clear is whether after the scaling down the system will cost less than half a million or not. If they did not work, there would be no reason to try. Since they did, it makes a good deal of sense to try. After all, we have almost twice the temperature delta and a lot of really bright back yard machinests. We just need to get em started in the right direction.  Now, what way was that again? … The Carnot efficiency is set by the temperature difference… So you’d start with 60/(273+60), ie 18%, and go downhill from there, with a real engine. Say 5% overall heat-to-motion? OK. Let me draw this more clearly. The heat engine, without losses, puts all the input heat into either output heat or energy. Due to the very high efficiency of a generator/motor, we will ignore for the moment the relatively small losses in moving from mechanical to electrical and back. The heat pump is exactly the same but reversed. The ratio of input heat to output energy and vice verse, is a larger number when the temperature difference is lower. That is, if the temperature difference is small, you get little energy out, but you do not have to put much energy in either. The outside will be assumed to be around 5-10C, the house around 25C, and the source about 90C. I get about 21% for the hot stage heat to energy. The cold stage however only takes about 7% to pump the same heat into the house. The overall gain then is a factor of 3.8. For every BTU we suck from the 90C tank, we suck 2.8 from the outside. This advantage goes up rapidly if the outside temp is warmer than 5C, but also goes down fast if it is much colder . Friction losses and leakage blows hell out of this estimate, so we have to make pretty good motors and pumps or we just won’t get the performance. However, it should be possible to get a 80-90% thermodynamic  efficiency (that is the % of the peak carnot efficiency of the “perfect” heat engine) with a motor as large as 5-10 HP, at least I think that is reasonable. A nice compact little turbine? Well, that is the point. Not enough work in this area. But the thermodynamics and some close data points suggest that we may be able to develop this system with a bit of work. BTW, there is a lot of energy in this tank. We could certainly use it to generate a lot of electric power without impacting it’s operation as heat source for the house much. The home heating demand is really large compared to a couple of lights here and there. Well, my vision for this system is a complete thermal and electrical management and storage system, to provide home heating, hot water, and refrigeration, with a minimum of waste. I think that is a good idea, but it is going to take some development for sure.

Response:

This involves choosing the right heat pump, solar hot water heaters pennsylvsnia  Stirling or steam engine for the job.

I am most interested in deciding which Stirling engine will produce electrical or at least mechanical power from heat. Failing that I want to use a steam engine for the same purpose.  Sensible Steam in Missouri has some nice small units but too small for me.  I am looking for a way to produce up to 50 KW in one project and 100 KW in several others using biomass as fuel. Cornelius A. Van Milligen Kentucky Enrichment Inc

Response:

spa heating united solar pv panel for

Question:

I’m considering trying to solar heat my hot tub.united solar pv panel for  The heating requirements are a bit odd. It needs to reach about 101F for perhaps 20 or 30 minutes a day, usually after dusk. The rest of the time it doesn’t really matter what the temperature is. It’s about 500 gallons of water. With these parameters, it seems like conventional pool and spa heaters don’t really do the job. They might keep the tub warm all day, rather than reaching a high temperature for a short period of time. I’d still need to fire up the gas heater to get to operating temperature. I’m thinking perhaps the thing to do is use a themosiphon to heat some water to above the operating temperature, and pump it into the tub just prior to use.united solar pv panel for  Any thoughts?

Response:

I am considering the same thing.united solar pv panel for  I figure the best way would be to use a fairly efficient type of panel to get the  most heat exchange. I’m planning on building a glazed copper panel myself with some tubing I have around. Mine has to fit two roof panels on the gazebo. I also bought a used controller on eBay. If it gets hot enough during the day then it should hold the heat until you get in as long as it is well insulated. Worst case, you’ll run your heater a lot less even if it’s kept at 90 or so by the sun. PS do search on “solar hot tub” on yahoo. I recall seeing a few projects that worked well.united solar pv panel for  I’m considering trying to solar heat my hot tub. The heating requirements are a bit odd. It needs to reach about 101F for perhaps 20 or 30 minutes a day, usually after dusk. The rest of the time it doesn’t really matter what the temperature is. It’s about 500 gallons of water. With these parameters, it seems like conventional pool and spa heaters don’t really do the job. They might keep the tub warm all day, rather than reaching a high temperature for a short period of time.united solar pv panel for  I’d still need to fire up the gas heater to get to operating temperature. I’m thinking perhaps the thing to do is use a themosiphon to heat some water to above the operating temperature, and pump it into the tub just prior to use. Any thoughts?

Response:

Yeah, my “heat just before use” method pretty much won’t work.united solar pv panel for  You need too much water at too high a temperature. Kind of obvious in retrospect. Apparently extensive insulation is in order.

Response:

I have had great success using Solar to heating my spa over the last 5 months.  After considering a solar water panel and pumping the water, a few experiments confirmed a better method. For years, blue plastic “solar blankets” have been sold to pool and spa owners.  The problem is they don’t work very well.   My tests with “solar blankets” only give less than 2 degree rise in the spa on the best day.united solar pv panel for   On some partly cloudy days, the temperatures would actually drop. A better method is cheap bubble wrap ($4 to $6).  It comes in large rolls.  Buy the large bubble size.   My spa needs 3 strips, which are placed parallel to each other. Preparation: Lay the 3 strips on top of your spa’s water, smooth side facing out.  Use a pen to trace the contours of the interior of your spa. Remove the strips and lay on a flat surface, in preparation to cutting. Then trim bubble wrap with simple sissors to match the contours of your spa.  Finally place the back on the water. My location is coastal San Diego, which is usually cool and sometimes foggy.  Also the spa gets full sun all day long.  Obviously, your results will vary with your location(s). The spa is above ground, electric heater, with lots of insulation on the sides, and a removable 3″ insulating cover.  At this point, the heating in the spa is set to 80F (essentially off). In the morning, I remove the insulating cover so the sun can reach the spa.  At night, I put the cover back on. Results: on Sunny days, there is get a 5F to 10F degree rise. Sometimes, it gets too hot and cold water must added!  On foggy days, do not bother removing the cover. The bubble wrap has lasted so far…  not counting the obsessive desire of my wife to pop the bubbles  :-) A friend of mine is investigating more durable materials.  In the mean timeunited solar pv panel for , I am enjoying the dramatic reduction in electric bills. Regards Lawrence Taylor

Response:

A little more expensive – maybe $1 or $2 /sq ft – you can get material up to 4′ wide in rolls which is basically 2 layers of large-bubble wrap, sealed face to face, with foil on both sides. I believe it will have the most effect if you have an air space of about 1 ” on either side of the foil. If you made it a little bigger than the spa, draped it over the sides but let it sag down, and then put a cover over that,united solar pv panel for  you would have some serious insulation value. I use the stuff as a curtain in my greenhouse – at night in the winter and sometimes in the afternoon in the summer.united solar pv panel for

Response:

you can get material up to 4′ wide in rolls which is basically 2 layers of large-bubble wrap, sealed face to face, united solar pv panel for with foil on both sides.

Cool. What’s it called? Where can you buy it?

Response:

I’m considering trying to solar heat my hot tub. The heating requirements are a bit odd. It needs to reach about 101F for perhaps 20 or 30 minutes a day, usually after dusk. The rest of the time it doesn’t really matter what the temperature is. It’s about 500 gallons of water.

But fairly useless for thermal storage, since people find 105 F too hot and 103 too cold :-( A 104 F Florida tub used 1.5 hours per day lost 20K Btu/day (180 kWh/mo) over average 73 F days in 1995, but some tubs live in 30 F air… A better cover and fewer bubbles would help. With these parameters, it seems like conventional pool and spa heaters don’t really do the job. They might keep the tub warm all day, rather than reaching a high temperature for a short period of time. I’d still need to fire up the gas heater to get to operating temperature.

You might solar heat the tub to 104 F max, and let the temp fall at night, so you don’t use much gas on an average day… I’m thinking perhaps the thing to do is use a themosiphon to heat some water to above the operating temperature,united solar pv panel for  and pump it into the tub just prior to use.

That’s a lot of water, as you say,united solar pv panel for  and modern hot tubs seem very well insulated, except for the cover. Some have 6 or 8 inches of foam under the shell. You might make a 4′ foam cube to hold 500 gallons of hot water, and move the water into the tub before use and back to the cube afterwards, but the cube would lose heat as well. With 96 ft^2 of 6″ Styrofoam walls, the conductance would be 96ft^2/(R5×6) = 3.2 Btu/h-F, so it would lose about 24h(104-73)3.2 = 2.4K Btu/day. Or make the cube the tub, eg a 6′x6′x 3′ tall box (ID) with 1′ Styrofoam walls and a 1′ thick hinged lid, and about 210 ft^2 of average wall area and 210ft^2/(R5×12) = 3.5 Btu/h-F of conductance and 24h(104-73)3.5 = 2604 Btu/day of heat loss, with the lid closed. But Styrofoam costs about $4/ft^3 ($16/4′x8′x1.5″ sheet, where I live), and that tub would need 212 ft^3, and it wouldn’t be as nice as a commercial tub… I like the idea of improving the lid and disconnecting the blower and heating a commercial tub with solar heated water, vs electricity. We might make a better lid with bolts and deck screws and multiple layers of Styrofoam with latex paint or plywood on the outside, and lift it with a large tripod and pulley and counterweight. The tub thermostat might turn on a small pump instead of a heater and circulate warmer water through a hose coiled up in the bottom. People say hot tub heaters can be unreliable. They scale up and burn out, and cost $200 or so to replace. And some of the chemicals used in tubs are there to prevent that scaling. I’d vote for fewer chemicals. Just ozone and copper ions (5 parts per billion :-) from a sponge in the filter. We might supply 20K Btu/day (833 Btu/h) with 100′ of 5/8″ reinforced garden hose, about 5 turns around a 6′ tub. A heat exchange calc: if C lb/h of water moves through the hose, NTU = 16ft^2×10Btu/h-F-ft^2/C, approximately, and E = 1-exp(-NTU), with a 0 capacity rate ratio (the tub temp change is small compared to the hose temp change)… 120 F water leaves the hose at T = 120-E(120-104), and 833 = C(120-T) = 16C(1-exp(-160/C)), so C = 52/(1-exp(-160/C)). Starting with C = 52 pounds per hour on the right hand side makes C = 54.5 on the left. Plugging that back in makes C 54.9, 54.98, and 54.99, so C is about 55, ie 0.11 gpm, and E = 0.945, and the water goes back in to the central water heater at T = 104.9 F via the drain hose fitting. We might use Grainger’s $118 4PC86 6 gpm pump to circulate hot water. It draws about 40 watts, ie 40×0.11/6 = 1W running 2% of the time. To change the tub water, we could turn off the tub heat and close a valve to the cold water input of the water heater and let the cold water bypass the pump and enter the hose for preheating household water and cooling the tub water, then drain the tub after it’s cold (how long would it take, with typical family hot water consumption?), and refill it via the hose with a mix of fresh hot and cold water. united solar pv panel for

Response:

you can get material up to 4′ wide in rolls which is basically 2 layers of large-bubble wrap, sealed face to face, with foil on both sides. Cool. What’s it called? Where can you buy it?

The bubble wrap is not the only solution. We also have tried various other materials (black plastic drop cloth, black corrogated plastic, etc). In general, far better results were experienced with clear material that allow the sunlight to penetrate the water.  Black absorbers on the surface simply did not work as well. We even tried black sheet below (in the water) the bubble wrap.  After many experiments, simple bubble wrap worked the best.  I have various theories for these results but will not bore you. However, your location and sun angle might be different so I encourage you to experiment.united solar pv panel for   What’s neat about the various plastics, is their low cost.  Try different combinations. If a combination does not work, you have not lost a lot of money and can experiment with something else.

Response:

Lawrence Taylor’s response below takes a different approach to the problem from mine. Are you heating the water by circulating it through a separate solar collector, or are you just trying to get as much heat as you can from the sun shining directly into the tub? I had assumed the former so I was suggesting foil covered bubble wrap solely as a means of keeping in heat – Lawrence is using clear bubble wrap to allow heat in and then keep it in. It won’t keep it in as well as foil-covered will, but if there is a net gain from the sun, then that would be a better and cheaper solution than mine. So what if you used Lawrence’s clear bubble-pack during the day, and around sunset, drape the foil-covered bubble wrap over it and then something over that as I described earlier. There is also a 4′x8′ foil-covered foam board available. What if you put that over the top during the night with a weight to hold it tight to the rim of the hot tub, and during the day set it along the north side of the rim so that the foil reflects more heat into the tub – leaving the clear bubble wrap in place to help to keep the heat in. You would probably want a wooden frame on the foam board and some way to keep it in place because it is very light and it is going to blow away with the slightest breeze. Bob

The bubble wrap is not the only solution. We also have tried variousbunited  solar pv panel for  other materials (black plastic drop cloth, black corrogated plastic, etc). In general, far better results were experienced with clear material that allow the sunlight to penetrate the water.  Black absorbers on the surface simply did not work as well. We even tried black sheet below (in the water) the bubble wrap.  After many experiments, simple bubble wrap worked the best.  I have various theories for these results but will not bore you. However, your location and sun angle might be different so I encourage you to experiment.  What’s neat about the various plastics, is their low cost.  Try different combinations. If a combination does not work, you have not lost a lot of money and can experiment with something else.

Response:

I don’t know what it is called – I just go in and describe it – 21 layers of bubble wrap with foil on the outsides. I get it from my local building supply store, but I’ve seen it at Home Depot as well. I think it is easy to find.united solar pv panel for  you can get material up to 4′ wide in rolls which is basically 2 layers of large-bubble wrap, sealed face to face, with foil on both sides. Cool. What’s it called? Where can you buy it?

Response:

you can get material up to 4′ wide in rolls which is basically 2 layers of large-bubble wrap, sealed face to face, with foil on both sides. Cool.united solar pv panel for  What’s it called? Where can you buy it?

Generically, it’s called a radiant barrier.  One company is Reflectix (www.reflectixinc.com).  I’ve seen it at Home Desperate, Lowe’sunited solar pv panel for , and Ace Hardware, priced by the lineal foot. united solar pv panel for

Response:

A little more expensive – maybe $1 or $2 /sq ft – you can get material up to 4′ wide in rolls which is basically 2 layers of large-bubble wrap, sealed face to face, with foil on both sides.

Uhh, foil???  You describe good insulation, but it pretty much prevents solar heating effect.  The foil is a barrier for radiative heat transfer. that, you would have some serious insulation value.

Yup. sdb — Evidently some sorry coward was offended by one of my posts. The wuss was too scared to speak out in public.  Poor baby…  *** More guns means less crime.  ISBN:0-226-49363-6  *** Watch out for munged e-mail address. User should be  sdbUse1  and host is  at  bigfoot.com Do NOT send me unsolicited commercial e-mail (UCE)!

Response:

Converting a "Laser" back to electric power ? solar pv panel installation

Question:

Imagine that NASA sends up 5 sattelites,solar pv panel installation  The 4 sattelites will orbit the sun, within the Earth’s orbit. Each sattelite is equipped with a huge solar panel, generating power for a laser. This laser is directed against the 5th recieving sattelite, orbiting Earth. When a sattelite is beyond the sun, the laser will be sent to another sattelite, which will direct(mirror/convert) the laser, against the recieveing sattelite. But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? solar pv panel installation  Can you use a solar power panel again ?solar pv panel installation

Response:

solar pv panel installation Imagine that NASA sends up 5 sattelites, The 4 sattelites will orbit the sun, within the Earth’s orbit. Each sattelite is equipped with a huge solar panel, generating power for a laser. This laser is directed against the 5th recieving sattelite, orbiting Earth. When a sattelite is beyond the sun, the laser will be sent to another sattelite, which will direct(mirror/convert) the laser, against the recieveing sattelite. But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? Can you use a solar power panel again ? — Regards Ingolf A wild idea…

how about mirrors instead of solar panels and lasers? and how about the satellites be in orbit around the earth instead of around the sun? and then let’s aim them all at the polar ice caps!  But first, everyone has to get scuba gear.

Response:

Don’t need a laser..microwaves work just as well, if not better.solar pv panel installation   The last number I saw was something like 50% efficiency for the transmission of power, and that was years ago. There are a few problems though, regardless of the medium you use: what happens if something moves through the beam? That can be minimised by making the beam fairly diffuse, but the real problem is that it COULD be used as a weapon: a 100 megawatt beam of anything would probably do something nasty if aimed at a population centre! Time to build that skyhook…. –

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Imagine that NASA sends up 5 sattelites, The 4 sattelites will orbit the sun, within the Earth’s orbit. Each sattelite is equipped with a huge solar panel, generating power for a laser. This laser is directed against the 5th recieving sattelite, orbiting Earth. When a sattelite is beyond the sun, the laser will be sent to another sattelite, which will direct(mirror/convert) the laser, against the recieveing sattelite. But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? Can you use a solar power panel again ?solar pv panel installation

Response:

Yes… but still … its the only way to transport energy wireless …. There must be a wave of ‘converting’ the light into a non-dangerous wave… or just close… — Regards Ingolf

- Hsolar pv panel installation  its the only way to transport energy wireless …. There must be a wave of ‘converting’ the light into a non-dangerous wave… or just close… — Regards Ingolf Don’t need a laser..microwaves work just as well, if not better.  The last number I saw was something like 50% efficiency for the transmission of power, and that was years ago. There are a few problems though, regardless of the medium you use: what happens if something moves through the beam? That can be minimised by making the beam fairly diffuse, but the real problem is that it COULD be used as a weapon: a 100 megawatt beam of anything would probably do something nasty if aimed at a population centre! Time to build that skyhook…. — Imagine that NASA sends up 5 sattelites, The 4 sattelites will orbit the sun, within the Earth’s orbit. Each sattelite is equipped with a huge solar panel, generating power for a laser. This laser is directed against the 5th recieving sattelite, orbiting Earth. When a sattelite is beyond the sun, the laser will be sent to another sattelite, which will direct(mirror/convert) the laser, against the recieveing sattelite. But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? Can you use a solar power panel again ?solar pv panel installation

Response:

Yes i have heard about the mirror theori too ;) I heard about a plant, in Africa somewhere… where about 400 mirrors was computercontrolled. All the mirrors sent the sunlight against a small piece of glasspipe. The water was offcourse flowing, in the glasspipe. This raised the temperature in the highlighted area to more than 100 degrees celcius, and also completely cleaned the water, in the same provess. In this way a small solar powerplant could work… but only on sunny days. :( Suppose the plant was build on the moon… 100% pure energy constantly… but not much thou… If you build a powerplant in space, that in theori could supply the whole planet with energy, how do you get it back to earth ? If its possible to transport energy thru light, with a minimum waste on the transport, could the new discovery, of ’speeding down the light’ be used ? Interesting futurethinking… — Regards Ingolf

solar pv panel installation Doesn’t matter which way you slice it: if you have ‘X’ amount of power to move from A to B, it’s either concentrated or diffuse. If you want diffuse…just put your solar panels on the ground! Of course…it might be easier not to bother putting the PV’s in space: just leave them on the ground, and put a bloody great mirror in space. MUCH easier & cheaper! Then your PV array could work at night. Or run a *really* long extension cord about 35 000 km. — Yes… but still … its the only way to transport energy wireless …. There must be a wave of ‘converting’ the light into a non-dangerous wave… or just close… — Regards Ingolf Don’t need a laser..microwaves work just as well, if not better.  The last number I saw was something like 50% efficiency for the transmission of power, and that was years ago. There are a few problems though, regardless of the medium you use: what happens if something moves through the beam? That can be minimised by making the beam fairly diffuse, but the real problem is that it COULD be used as a weapon: a 100 megawatt beam of anything would probably do something nasty if aimed at a population centre! Time to build that skyhook…. — Imagine that NASA sends up 5 sattelites, The 4 sattelites will orbit the sun, within the Earth’s orbit. Each sattelite is equipped with a huge solar panel, generating power for a laser. This laser is directed against the 5th recieving sattelite, orbiting Earth. When a sattelite is beyond the sun, the laser will be sent to another sattelite, which will direct(mirror/convert) the laser, against the recieveing sattelite. But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? Can you use a solar power panel again ? — Regards Ingolf A wild idea…

Response:

As William said microwaves would be better. you could run them at the same power or a little higher as full sun but it would be 24/7/365. -solar pv panel installation  Imagine that NASA sends up 5 sattelites, The 4 sattelites will orbit the sun, within the Earth’s orbit. Each sattelite is equipped with a huge solar panel, generating power for a laser. This laser is directed against the 5th recieving sattelite, orbiting Earth. When a sattelite is beyond the sun, the laser will be sent to another sattelite, which will direct(mirror/convert) the laser, against the recieveing sattelite. But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? Can you use a solar power panel again ? — Regards Ingolf A wild idea… solar pv panel installation

Response:

: As William said microwaves would be better. you could run them at the : same power or a little higher as full sun but it would be 24/7/365. …just don’t let that “aim” drift, or you’d start cooking random things on the ground.  ”Death ray in space”… I’m thinking it’d be a tough public-relations sell.solar pv panel installation

Response:

A tough sell? Naahhh..instead of ’star wars’, spend 60 billion on ‘eco-friendly orbiting power stations’. No more nukes, nasty dams, coal/oil plants..just clean, solar energy! Oh..ok..so the military might want to borrow it for a few minutes every now and again, but what the hell..California is used to worse! solar pv panel installation  As William said microwaves would be better. you could run them at the : same power or a little higher as full sun but it would be 24/7/365. …just don’t let that “aim” drift, or you’d start cooking random things on the ground.  ”Death ray in space”… I’m thinking it’d be a tough public-relations sellsolar pv panel installation.

Response:

…just don’t let that “aim” drift, or you’d start cooking random things on the ground.  ”Death ray in space”… I’m thinking it’d be a tough public-relations sell. solar pv panel installation

It wouldn’t be any worse then strong sunshine

Response:

I don’t think there’s a factor 4000 on the market yet…solar pv panel installation   It wouldn’t be any worse then strong sunshine

Response:

Ya there is, It’s called flannel – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I don’t think there’s a factor 4000 on the market yet… — It wouldn’t be any worse then strong sunshine

Response:

Here is a link to an actual plant using mirrors.solar pv panel installation


..  during the time of star wars a mirror system was also suggested for the purpose of lighting “blacked out” areas during the night….  it would only focus the light enough to be equivalent to the sun over maybe a 100 mile radius…  now of course they say just a 100 square miles is enough ground for all the solar energy needed to power the USA I think… Carl

-solar pv panel installationl? Naahhh..instead of ’star wars’, spend 60 billion on ‘eco-friendly orbiting power stations’. No more nukes, nasty dams, coal/oil plants..just clean, solar energy! Oh..ok..so the military might want to borrow it for a few minutes every now and again, but what the hell..California is used to worse! — : As William said microwaves would be better. you could run them at the : same power or a little higher as full sun but it would be 24/7/365. …just don’t let that “aim” drift, or you’d start cooking random things on the ground.  ”Death ray in space”… I’m thinking it’d be a tough public-relations sell.solar pv panel installation

Response:

You folks are missing the point. I can build the system as a large phased array antenna that is locked onto a source on the ground and can’t be focused elsewhere. (If it looses lock, it defocuses and becomes just loud RF noise). If the UN military indicates “we will fry you” (having somehow subverted the design and construction process), the opponent says, “I have a large rocket with 5 tons of sand”. This power system is a large fixed target. It could be used for a weapon only once, and only without warning. Properly designed it would work safely, or not at all, and the largest risk is that opposing military forces would threaten each others power sats, and take us all off line for years. Think of the threat from Iraq. “Leave us alone while we eat our prey, or sit in the dark for a few years.”

solar pv panel installationl? Naahhh..instead of ’star wars’, spend 60 billion on ‘eco-friendly orbiting power stations’. No more nukes, nasty dams, coal/oil plants..just clean, solar energy! Oh..ok..so the military might want to borrow it for a few minutes every now and again, but what the hell..California is used to worse!

Response:

Well… atleast it could be used for missions to Mars, or any other planet… still it would be dangerous… but this should be handle by simple computers, following Azimuts laws… and the 45-72% effeciancy , im sure, could be refined with some investigation, to be more like 90-95% effectiveness. Imagine the free power spacecrafts could harvest. Ion engines/ or better, could then power the space craft. Put about 100 laserrecievers/sattelites in close orbit around the Sun. All recievers/sattelites, should “work” together gathering Solarenergy, all around the sun to one HUGE power source, or in many small lasers, powering small crafts. — Regards Ingolf – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Imagine that NASA sends up 5 sattelites, The 4 sattelites will orbit the sun, within the Earth’s orbit. Each sattelite is equipped with a huge solar panel, generating power for a laser. This laser is directed against the 5th recieving sattelite, orbiting Earth. When a sattelite is beyond the sun, the laser will be sent to another sattelite, which will direct(mirror/convert) the laser, against the recieveing sattelite. But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? Can you use a solar power panel again ? — Regards Ingolf A wild idea…  The problem with using a laser is that it isn’t very power efficient, i.e. the power you get out of the system versus the power you put in. I deal with lasers at my place of employment and we usually see 10% efficiency. Of course I’m not dealing with free space lasers (usually CO2 lasers, dye lasers, or DPSS lasers), but solid state lasers (diode lasers) coupled into an optical fiber. Using microwaves is better (and more efficient) and conversion back to useful electric power is also better (and more efficient) Microwave conversion efficiency could probably reach 90%, and conversion efficiency of microwave energy back to electricity would probably be somewhere between 50 and 80%. Total efficiency would be somewhere between 45 and 72%.   There is a down side to using lasers for power transmission: You’ve now got one hell of a powerful laser weapon in orbit.   The laser beam would have to be very powerful and very narrow (relatively speaking) compared to using microwaves to transmit power. Even a small off axis error in aiming the downlink laser could cause a lot of damagesolar pv panel installation!

Response:

solar pv panel installation  Imagine that NASA sends up 5 sattelites, The 4 sattelites will orbit the sun, within the Earth’s orbit. Each sattelite is equipped with a huge solar panel, generating power for a laser. This laser is directed against the 5th recieving sattelite, orbiting Earth. When a sattelite is beyond the sun, the laser will be sent to another sattelite, which will direct(mirror/convert) the laser, against the recieveing sattelite. But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? Can you use a solar power panel again ? — Regards Ingolf A wild idea…

The problem with using a laser is that it isn’t very power efficient, i.e. the power you get out of the system versus the power you put in. I deal with lasers at my place of employment and we usually see 10% efficiency. Of course I’m not dealing with free space lasers (usually CO2 lasers, dye lasers, or DPSS lasers), but solid state lasers (diode lasers) coupled into an optical fiber. Using microwaves is better (and more efficient) and conversion back to useful electric power is also better (and more efficient) Microwave conversion efficiency could probably reach 90%, and conversion efficiency of microwave energy back to electricity would probably be somewhere between 50 and 80%. Total efficiency would be somewhere between 45 and 72%.   There is a down side to using lasers for power transmission: You’ve now got one hell of a powerful laser weapon in orbit.   The laser beam would have to be very powerful and very narrow (relatively speaking) compared to using microwaves to transmit power. Even a small off axis error in aiming the downlink laser could cause a lot of damage!solar pv panel installation

Response:

Theoretically you can attain 98% efficiency converting incoming laser energy back to electricity – assuming no losses in transit, and the laser is bandgap matched to the photocell in question. Solar cells are relatively inefficient because they must deal with so called ‘thermal light sources.’  That is their color is spread across the spectrum according to the Planck Curve.  The surface of the Sun is about 5800K, so the Planck Curve for sunlight is that of a 5800K radiator. Solar cells, and all photo-cells, convert light to electricity whenever electrons are promoted across a bandgap.  There is a bandgap energy associated with this.  Each photon of light impinging on a photocell or solar cell, has a photon energy associated with it. Shorter or bluer wavelengths are more energetic than longer or redder wavelengths. When the photon energy is less than the bandgap energy, the photo cell doesn’t get enough energy to promote electrons across the bandgap,solar pv panel installation  so this energy doesn’t contribute at all to the photocell’s operation. When the photon energy is greater than the bandgap energy, the photo cell gets enough energy to promote electrons across the bandgap, but only the bandgap energy is contributed to the photo-cell’s operation. So, for colors that are twice as energetic as the bandgap energy for example, the circuit only gets half of those photon’s energy. When the photon energy matches the bandgap energy, the photocell gets enough energy to promote electrons across the bandgap, and all of the photon’s energy goes into the photo-cell’s operation.  The efficiency is limited by a second order effect- the external quantum efficiency. The EQE for most photocells exceeds 98%! So, to figure out how efficient a photocell is draw a Planck Curve for sunlight, then at the color that equals the bandgap energy draw a vertical line.  To the right – for long wavelengths – draw a horizontal line at 0. Then at the point this vertical line crosses the Planck Curve draw a 1/x line that tends to zero at zero wavelength.  Now, take the area under the constructed curve and divide it by the area of the Planck Curve.  That’s your efficiency – for that bandgap. Different materials have different bandgaps when made into photocells. So, if you can segment the sunlight into different colors, and illuminate the right material combo – you can get really efficient conversion overall. Recently, 3M developed a new type of optical bandpass filter that efficiently segments light by color.  Its called GBO – Giant Birefringent Optics.  This material is as cheap as trash bags to make, and more reflective than silver, and can be engineered to segment light efficiently by color. So, we have all we need to create is a 10+ bandgap muli-frequency photocell array that is over 80% efficient!!! You build a concentrator made out of a pillow.  Two pieces of plastic material, one a full spectrum GBO reflector, the other transparent window, that reflects long wave radiation that can’t be converted by your photocells out of the system.  These are bonded together at the edge creating a circular assembly.  Inflate the pillow.  Now you’ve got a lightweight concentrator.  Hold the pillow in a lightweight strut, and point it at the sun.  At the focus put a fresnel lens to form a small white light beam out of the focal point energy.  In the beam place a stack of GBO optical bandpass filters – canted at 45 degree angles to the beam. To the side of each filter is a bandgap matched photocell.  Each photocell must be electrically loaded to obtain high efficiency, and the current/voltage curve for each material is distinctly different across the stack.  So, you invert each photocell’s output and run it through a special transformer stack that does this – efficiently sharing the load across each photocell in the stack. And there you have it!  A lightweight, low cost (the area of the photocells is miniscule compared to the concentrator), highly efficient solar converter. By substituting diode lasers for your photocells, you’d have a system that will be 60% efficient at generating laser energy from sunlight. You’d have ten + different colors, and each color would be beamed to a different bandgap matched reciever. By putting 10 different beam steering apparatus in front of each laser beam, you could beam energy from orbit in a very compact laser beam to hundreds or perhaps thousands of users on the ground. Allowing for another 10% loss due to atmospheric absorption of laser energy, it should be possible to build an orbiting laser power station with 50% efficiency.  The receivers on the ground are tiny because the energy in the laser beams are very intenst.  Because they’re small, they’re far easier to avoid than miles wide beams using microwaves. The advantages of space based systems over ground based systems is that they are much smaller and lighter for a given power output and in space you can deliver your power anywhere the Earth is visible.  Why space solar plants smaller tha ground based?  First, the sun is always shining in space.  No night, no clouds.  This reduces your area by 1/4th.  Also, sunlight is about twice as brilliant on orbit because there’s no air losses.  So, cut your size by half again.  Since there’s no time the system’s not working interrmediate fuel storage isn’t needed.  This means no loss of efficiency by including this step.  This also means there’s no fuel production plant and now fuel distribution system and no energy production plant – and no losses associated with these steps.  You just have transmitter and reciever. Overall, you can produce something like 60 times the power with the same collector in orbit than on the ground.  With lightweight mirrors the cost of putting stuff in orbit isn’t the big, so you still have an advantage. Recent advances in controlling laser beams using a process called 4 wave mixing – means that it is possible to create millions of beams simultaneously from a single device.  It also provides a way to deliver laser energy in a way that’s guaranteed to be absolutely safe! But, how costly would an orbiting station be?  In the 1950s NASA orbited a 45 meter diameter balloon called ECHO.  This balloon, with inflating apparatus and gas, massed about 70 kg.  It stayed inflated for over 5 years. It should be possible to build a 700 meter diameter concentrating pillow with laser beam generator/steerer – that could fit on board a modern Atlas missile. Such a satellite could deliver 276,852,618.75 watts of power continuously to any point on Earth. This translates to 2,426,890,055,962.5 watt hours of energy.  At $20 per MW-hr this translates to $48,537,801.12 per year income – with no recurring cost.   Assuming a total life cycle of 15 years can be achieved with this system, over half a billion dollars can be earned from each satellite.  Each satellite can be orbited for less than $100 million – so satellites could be justified commercially.  Note, the average cost of electricity in the US averages around $60 per MW-hr, although the cheapest power from hydroplants etc., can fall below $20 per MW-hr. The US has 800 billion watts of installed generator capacity.  At 250 million watts each, this means that 3,200 satellites of the type described would equal the current US installed capacity. Current satellite launch rate worldwide are approximately 150 per year.  Without any increased capacity in rocket production plants, launch center expansion, etc., 220 flights per year could be supported – which would be sufficient to build up 3,200 solar power sats and maintain them over 15 years. The addition of this system to our current network of power technologies would reduce our reliance on fossil fuels, moderate fuel prices, and expand the global economy.  Since the US benefits disproportionately from global expansion (and suffers likewise from a global contraction), this should benefit US economic interests. Part of the money earned by the satellite owners could be used to increase space launch capacity, improve the satellite design, and so forth, to increase the amount of energy produced in orbit – so that the entire world, within 30 years – could consume energy at US per capita rates – increasing living standards, and eliminating greenhouse gas emissions. solar pv panel installation

Response:

The microwave idea could be dangerous.

How so?  We’re talking a total power density about 1/4 that of sunlight.  And, unlike the maser in your microwave oven (which is specifically tuned to be absorbed by water), this one would be at a frequency which is *not* absorbed by water (wouldn’t make it through the atmosphere very well otherwise!).  Can’t see what’s dangerous about it. But so many things are dangerous today. Offcouse one could place the reciever station on the moon, and then beam the power from here.

Huh? Or is there another way of sending power wireless ?

Microwave power transmission is the most practical by far, I think, at least if you need to go through the atmosphere. I read some of Arthur C. Clarkes ideas, and he had an idea of making an elevator to space. Transport would be magnetic fields. But would this be possible ?

OK, now we’re just getting silly.  That’s probably possible someday, but not in the near future.  Whereas, solar power sats with microwave transmission to ground are possible (maybe even practical) today. See solar pv panel installation

Response:

That would be very inefficient.  The scifi vision usually has solar power satellites transmitting energy to earth as microwaves.

Where “scifi” is defined as “technology that’s feasible but has not yet been demonstrated,” yes.  In the same sort of “scifi” would be a lunar base, a terabyte storage device that fits in your pocket, and speaker-independent dictation software.  Hmm, actually most of those are harder than solar power satellites; SPS is more challenging politically and economically than technologically. Of course the only way to move a technology out of this “scifi” category is to demonstrate it.  Given our current (and coming) energy shortages, it seems to me that we should be investing in a demonstrator mission or two for this ASAP. Cheers, – Joe — |    Joseph J. Strout         Check out the Mac Web Directory:     |

solar pv panel installation

Response:

The microwave idea could be dangerous. But so many things are dangerous today. Offcouse one could place the reciever station on the moon, and then beam the power from here. Or is there another way of sending power wireless ? I read some of Arthur C. Clarkes ideas, and he had an idea of making an elevator to space. Transport would be magnetic fields. But would this be possible ? Could you place material, that goes thru earth’s atmosphere, and out into space. If so.. it must be connected to a sattelite, that holds the whole thing up. This could be use as a reciever station, both for the transport, and also for sending power back to earth. — Regards Ingolf

solar pv panel installation Imagine that NASA sends up 5 sattelites, The 4 sattelites will orbit the sun, within the Earth’s orbit. Each sattelite is equipped with a huge solar panel, generating power for a laser. This laser is directed against the 5th recieving sattelite, orbiting Earth. When a sattelite is beyond the sun, the laser will be sent to another sattelite, which will direct(mirror/convert) the laser, against the recieveing sattelite. Doesn’t seem like a very good design to me.  Better to have just the 1 satellite, in geosynchronous orbit, with a huge solar array.  Then it beams the power to earth as a laser in the microwave range (roughly the same range used by cellular phones) — i.e., a maser. But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? Can you use a solar power panel again ? Visible light isn’t a very good choice for this, partly because it can’t be efficiently converted back into electricity.  But microwaves are very efficiently converted by a simple rectenna (basically, a big wire mesh). Do some web searches on “space solar power satellites” for more info solar pv panel installation.

Response:

I would only be dangerous if you camped out on the reciever grid. The problem with the space elevator (as Clarke pointed out) was the material needed. Other wise its a great idea. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The microwave idea could be dangerous. But so many things are dangerous today. Offcouse one could place the reciever station on the moon, and then beam the power from here. Or is there another way of sending power wireless ? I read some of Arthur C. Clarkes ideas, and he had an idea of making an elevator to space. Transport would be magnetic fields. But would this be possible ? Could you place material, that goes thru earth’s atmosphere, and out into space. If so.. it must be connected to a sattelite, that holds the whole thing up. This could be use as a reciever station, both for the transport, and also for sending power back to earth. — Regards Ingolf Imagine that NASA sends up 5 sattelites, The 4 sattelites will orbit the sun, within the Earth’s orbit. Each sattelite is equipped with a huge solar panel, generating power for a laser. This laser is directed against the 5th recieving sattelite, orbiting Earth. When a sattelite is beyond the sun, the laser will be sent to another sattelite, which will direct(mirror/convert) the laser, against the recieveing sattelite. Doesn’t seem like a very good design to me.  Better to have just the 1 satellite, in geosynchronous orbit, with a huge solar array.  Then it beams the power to earth as a laser in the microwave range (roughly the same range used by cellular phones) — i.e., a maser. But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? Can you use a solar power panel again ? Visible light isn’t a very good choice for this, partly because it can’t be efficiently converted back into electricity.  But microwaves are very efficiently converted by a simple rectenna (basically, a big wire mesh). Do some web searches on “space solar power satellites” for more info. solar pv panel installation

Response:

Imagine that NASA sends up 5 sattelites, The 4 sattelites will orbit the sun, within the Earth’s orbit. Each sattelite is equipped with a huge solar panel, generating power for a laser. This laser is directed against the 5th recieving sattelite, orbiting Earth. When a sattelite is beyond the sun, the laser will be sent to another sattelite, which will direct(mirror/convert) the laser, against the recieveing sattelite. But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? Can you use a solar power panel again ? — Regards Ingolf A wild idea…

Response:

But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? Can you use a solar power panel again ?

That would be very inefficient.solar pv panel installation  The scifi vision usually has solar power satellites transmitting energy to earth as microwaves.

Response:

Imagine that NASA sends up 5 sattelites, The 4 sattelites will orbit the sun, within the Earth’s orbit. Each sattelite is equipped with a huge solar panel, generating power for a laser. This laser is directed against the 5th recieving sattelite, orbiting Earth. When a sattelite is beyond the sun, the laser will be sent to another sattelite,solar pv panel installation  which will direct(mirror/convert) the laser, against the recieveing sattelite.

Doesn’t seem like a very good design to me.  Better to have just the 1 satellite, in geosynchronous orbit, with a huge solar array.  Then it beams the power to earth as a laser in the microwave range (roughly the same range used by cellular phones) — i.e., a maser. But how do you convert laser (light) back to energy ? Can you use a solar power panel again ?

Visible light isn’t a very good choice for this, partly because it can’t be efficiently converted back into electricity.  But microwaves are very efficiently converted by a simple rectenna (basically, a big wire mesh). Do some web searches on “space solar power satellites” for more info. solar pv panel installation

Response: