Tankless Solar Panel Inverter batterey Water Heater
Question:
Solar Panel Inverter battereyYou are sort of right but mostly wrong.
And yet, you have only supplied points which agree 100% with mine Solar Panel Inverter batterey Thanks for answering my rhetorical questions so coherently. My main point is that power companies have an interest in getting their customers to live within the company’s means, because that approach probably costs less than buying more capacity or buying power from “competitors.” So there is no inconsistency with power companies paying money for energy-saving programs, as implied by an earlier poster. -mod.
Response:
“The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price! Ben Franklin” – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Only if you want to fill a bucket with a given temperature of water. If you are (for example) taking a shower,Solar Panel Inverter batterey then a reducing the wattage of the heater will cause you to lower the flow to keep the temperature right. You won’t spend (much) longer in the shower, so it may be a net energy saving. If you are running a hotel, then ‘undersized’ water heaters might save you a moderate amount of money. Sounds like the same thing could be accomplished with a low flow showerhead. If the shower sucks I’m out of there much faster. IMO, this is precisely what holds back legitimate conservation efforts like solar water heaters and the like. People are sold some lower priced magic device. They buy it based on economics, psuedoscience, or thinking it’s possible to get something for little or nothing. Then they feel they need to defend their mistake for a while. They pretend they’re not suffering, until it breaks, then they go back to what they had in the first place, forever left with a bitter taste in their mouth about energy efficiency. Timers, low flow showerheads, tankless heaters. They’re all based on a mindset of “lack” rather than “abundance.” I’ve seen it first hand selling Solar Water Heaters. The miserly husband won’t admit he was wrong. Has all sorts of excuses. “I never run out of hot water.” “Cold showers are healthier.Solar Panel Inverter batterey” While the wife is there staring holes in him. It’s my guess he’ll be taking alot of cold showers.
Response:
Why would a power company sponsor something that saves 50 percent of the energy a home uses to heat water? So they don’t have to build more power plants, so the can’t sell power to other states at a premium? You got it exactly. They make more money selling power from the equipment they already have (which is already completely at least partly paid for) than by floating bonds to finance the manufacture of more capacity. How much more could they charge a neighboring utility than their own customers, for it to make economic sense to build a new plant for that specific market? If they can get their own customers to save energy, then maybe they CAN sell power to other states at a premium without building more plants. Then they make more money and consequently won’t have to charge their ratepayers as much. Solar Panel Inverter batterey
You are sort of right but mostly wrong.Solar Panel Inverter batterey If they could charge a neighboring utility so much more then wouldn’t it make sense to build a new plant to sell the them along with the increased use of your own buyers? After all if they can only sell 100 units now because that’s all they can spare but could sell 1000+ unit if they could produce it why not make it to sell? Two reasons. First is the fact that if it worked this way the other utility would build its own plant and tell the other one to shove off. But the real reason is. . . The capital outlay to build a new plant is going to take a LONG time to pay off and show a profit IF you can find some place willing to let you build it. So your thought of they want more ‘bang for the buck’ at each plant is correct. Ever wonder why California HAS to buy power from out of state? Its because everyone wants power but no one wants them to build a power plant near them. Since they don’t want the plants they have to pay what ever the people who build the plants outside the state wants them to. Its called supply and demand. Say you were in a group that went for a hike in the woods in the summer but didn’t want the bother of carrying water. At the end of the trail you are really, really, REALLY thirsty. Let’s say that I’m sitting at the trail end with a couple of extra liter bottles of water I had carried all along the trail. You come up and want to buy some water. I paid $1/bottle so you think paying $1.50 would be fair, after all I should get some profit. But before you can get to me someone else in your group offers $5 for a bottle. Now which one of you do you think is going to be drinking the water? If I have enough bottles how much do you think you are going to pay for a bottle? Are you being screwed? No. You could had all the water you wanted for $1/bottle, all you had to do is buy it and carry it with you. You made the decision not to buy it before and/or not to carry it with you so you are now paying the price of that decision. IOW,Solar Panel Inverter batterey in the real world stupidity and shortsightedness cost.
Response:
But, solar won’t work everywhere. For example in the past three days, there have been maybe an hour of sun in total, with that being pretty anemic due to high cloud.
I guess I’m so bitter because here in Florida there’s nothing but sun. It’s called the “Sunshine State” for God’s sake! Yet people still are looking for any and every other way, other than the obvious. — All the best,Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
“Tests, sponsored by Virginia Power, were performed at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia. The GFX was paired with various electric water heaters. The tests indicated that the $180 device can save up to 50 percent of the energy a home uses to heat water. In fact, when the GFX was installed, the water heater’s upper elements never energized, something the test report calls “a significant result.” Why would a power company sponsor something that saves 50 percent of the energy a home uses to heat water? So they don’t have to build more power plants, so the can’t sell power to other states at a premiumSolar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
Why would a power company sponsor something that saves 50 percent of the energy a home uses to heat water? So they don’t have to build more power plants, so the can’t sell power to other states at a premium?
You got it exactly. Solar Panel Inverter battereyThey make more money selling power from the equipment they already have (which is already completely at least partly paid for) than by floating bonds to finance the manufacture of more capacity. How much more could they charge a neighboring utility than their own customers, for it to make economic sense to build a new plant for that specific market? If they can get their own customers to save energy, then maybe they CAN sell power to other states at a premium without building more plants. Then they make more money and consequently won’t have to charge their ratepayers as much. -mod.
Response:
<snip There are other ways, for example heat-exchangers to recover heat from the waste water could dramatically reduce power bills for showers.
Solar Panel Inverter batterey Device Recovers Waste Energy From Drain Water The Department of Energy wants electric hot water production to be substantially more efficient by the year 2000, but the chances of pulling that off are slim with current water heater technology. Anything that helps builders meet the goal is bound to be well-received. That’s where the GFX comes in. The GFX is a counterflow heat exchanger. It consists of a coil of 1/2- or 3/4-in. copper tubing that’s tightly wrapped around a 3- or 4-in. diameter copper pipe. The device is installed vertically in the plumbing system. As waste water flows down through the vertical pipe section, it naturally clings to the walls of the pipe. More than half the waste water’s heat energy is transferred through the copper pipe and tubing to the incoming cold water. There is no pump and no storage tank. The device uses no electricity, so there is no operating cost. GFX only works when the drain and supply lines are being used simultaneously–as when someone is taking a shower. Tests, sponsored by Virginia Power, were performed at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia. The GFX was paired with various electric water heaters. The tests indicated that the $180 device can save up to 50 percent of the energy a home uses to heat water. In fact, when the GFX was installed, the water heater’s upper elements never energized, something the test report calls “a significant result.” GFX has been demonstrated in several model energy-efficient homes including one operated by the National Association of Homebuilders’ Research Center. — Steve Spence Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter & Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology: Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
Only if you want to fill a bucket with a given temperature of water. If you are (for example) taking a shower, then a reducing the wattage of the heater will cause you to lower the flow to keep the temperature right. You won’t spend (much) longer in the shower, so it may be a net energy saving. If you are running a hotel, then ‘undersized’ water heaters might save you a moderate amount of money. Sounds like the same thing could be accomplished with a low flow showerhead. If the shower sucks I’m out of there much faster.
If you put a lower flow showerhead on, then you don’t have the option of a high flow cooler shower (that some people like). The right solution is probably to charge for power used, and install a big heater. IMO, this is precisely what holds back legitimate conservation efforts like solar water heaters and the like. People are sold some lower priced magic device. They buy it based on economics, psuedoscience, or thinking it’s possible to get something for little or nothing. Then they feel they need to
But, solar won’t work everywhere. For example in the past three days, there have been maybe an hour of sun in total, with that being pretty anemic due to high cloud. There are other ways, for example heat-exchangers to recover heat from the waste water could dramatically reduce power bills for showers. Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
Only if you want to fill a bucket with a given temperature of water. If you are (for example) taking a shower, then a reducing the wattage of the heater will cause you to lower the flow to keep the temperature right. You won’t spend (much) longer in the shower, so it may be a net energy saving. If you are running a hotel,Solar Panel Inverter batterey then ‘undersized’ water heaters might save you a moderate amount of money.
Sounds like the same thing could be accomplished with a low flow showerhead. If the shower sucks I’m out of there much faster. IMO, this is precisely what holds back legitimate conservation efforts like solar water heaters and the like. People are sold some lower priced magic device. They buy it based on economics, psuedoscience, or thinking it’s possible to get something for little or nothing. Then they feel they need to defend their mistake for a while. They pretend they’re not suffering, until it breaks, then they go back to what they had in the first place, forever left with a bitter taste in their mouth about energy efficiency. Timers, low flow showerheads, tankless heaters. They’re all based on a mindset of “lack” rather than “abundance.” I’ve seen it first hand selling Solar Water Heaters. The miserly husband won’t admit he was wrong. Has all sorts of excuses. “I never run out of hot water.” “Cold showers are healthierSolar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
When 65F is very very hot compared to the outside temperature, the electric heat efficiency is higher, and the advantage of <snip Short of a heat pump or solar,wouldn’t multiple, smaller heaters solve the “long run”Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
When 65F is very very hot compared to the outside temperature, the electric heat efficiency is higher, and the advantage of a heat pump is much less.
This just reminded me. I sold Solar to a customer who had 15 gallon electric tanks in each bathroom, and under the kitchen sink. He initially installed them to save space in the closet where his 40 gallon heater was. I would think this might be ideal. I can’t remember exactly what motivated him to want Solar. He was a little eccentric. I know we installed the 80 gallon storage tank in his attic and got rid of all the other heaters. Solar Panel Inverter battereyIf memory serves me, I think that’s what closed the deal. He like the the hot, bulky water tank would be out of his air-conditioned living area and put in the attic, where in Florida, it’s deathly hot anyway. Short of a heat pump or solar,wouldn’t multiple, smaller heaters solve the “long run” loss/waiting problem, reduce tank surface area, and allow a slower, more efficient, heating of the water? — All the best, www.iwantsolar.com – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Sandy. this is a fundamental error of science. (The claim that electric heat is “100 % efficient” because 1 watt in produces a joule of heat energy.) The problem is that this is not a reversible process, though it has nothing to do with the rate of change, as Don suggested. It is because a heat pump, (assuming a near perfect one without the usual losses from heat leakage and friction), operates at a 100% thermodynamic efficiency, and can pump hundreds of joules of “low grade” heat (if the temperature difference is small enough), with only a few joules of high grade heat (where the temperature difference is very high). The electric heat is nearly 100% efficient when producing heat at extremely high temperatures. But it is a huge thermodynamic loss, waste of energy, loss of efficiency, to let this super hot heat warm a house up just a tiny bit. You really need that heat pump to even get close to 80% thermodynamic efficiency, except in Siberia in mid winter, perhaps. When 65F is very very hot compared to the outside temperature, the electric heat efficiency is higher, and the advantage of a heat pump is much less. … Tankless is fundamentally and thermodynamically flawed in that a
Response:
Changed out the old electric water heater for a new tankless on demand system. Electric bill has dropped $30.00 a month. System cost $500 and my old water heater needed replacement which would of cost $200 anyway. Solar Panel Inverter batterey Payback in utility savings is less than a year for us!
The laws of physics dictate that you can only save what was being lost through the walls of your old tank. Thirty dollars is a hefty loss. How old was your previous tank? Are you saving money by forced concervation, i.e. are you running out of hot water, or have you noticed that you’ve changed your habits at all to accomodate the new heater? A well insulated tank should only loose around $10/mth in heat, unless you’re in a really cold climate, or you had a really old poorly insulated water heater. — All the best, www.iwantsolar.com
Response:
Sometimes I think people get too carried away. I believe in the KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) principal. If everyone would use a simple batch heater to preheat the water before it got to the water heater, then there would be a lot of savings, and the outlay would be very low. That is one of the most cost effective uses of solar, most return, least outlay, quickest payback. However, most people going solar seem to think all or nothing. The advocates seem to ignore it for systems that cost thousands of dollars and payback over 10 or 20 years or more. A batch heater and your old HW heater are most likely cheaper to operate than a hot water on demand system, and costs less! If you get a new water heater that is more efficient the costs will be reduced more. Kip
Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Mr. Dully says it goes on the ground, but I wonder about the bang for the buck. It would only work in non-freezing weather. He says start with a “discarded water heater tank,” but most of those leak, and “stripping it down and painting it black” is lots of work. Add reflectors and insulation and some old storm windows on top and “a hinged cover or quilt” for nighttime… How many people would move the cover every day? Movable insulation didn’t move much inside passive solar houses. Won’t the quilt get moldy? We might have 90% solar hot water with lots of collection area and storage. Picture a large insulated shoebox on the lawn under a linear parabolic reflector, with a PV-powered pump to move water up through a shallow target trough near the north edge during the day. The water inside the box would be unpressurized, with an RV pump in the house…Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
Many States prohipit HOA from restricting Solar HW or PV systems. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – If this Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I don’t see how I could convince even .00000001 % of the American population to put that on their roof. Most suburban homes are now strictly regulated by home owner associations, and county inspectors, an old biddies (see http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/4370899.htm ) drive around just looking for those sort of monstrosities. If one is going to go through the initial trouble of hiring a contractor and pulling a permit, why would they impair the value of and salability their home? As I Contractor I wouldn’t touch it,and as a Real Estate Agent, I cringe when I see something like that. If you hire a Realtor to sell your home, something like that would have to be disclosed and remedied before it changes hands. — All the best, Stephen Horrillo www.iwantsolar.com
Perhaps I’m missing something. You’ve got a website devoted to solar water heating, but you haven’t heard of batch heaters? You’re a contractor who hasn’t considered ground mounting a solar device? You’re a RE agent who can’t convince 3 one-hundredths of a person in the US to install a batch heater? (help me with the math somebody, my calculator ain’t got that many zeros) :-) I question your statement that “most suburban homes are strictly regulated by HOA”. But if it were true, you should know that even the yard nazis often have limited authority when it comes to renewable energy, TV signal reception, etc. I clicked on the free-survey information link on your site, but it only leads to a blank email. Are you selling something? Wayne
Response:
Perhaps I’m missing something. You’ve got a website devoted to solar water heating, but you haven’t heard of batch heaters? You’re a contractor who hasn’t considered ground mounting a solar device? You’re a RE agent who can’t convince 3 one-hundredths of a person in the US to install a batch heater? (help me with the math somebody, my calculator ain’t got that many zeros) :-) I question your statement that “most suburban homes are strictly regulated by HOA”. But if it were true, you should know that even the yard nazis often have limited authority when it comes to renewable energy, TV signal reception, etc.
Yard “nazis” are abundant in many neighborhoods. City hall passes ordinances all the time (IMHO jsust to get them off their backs) based upon their gripes. Many complexes DO have a no outdoor antenna policy. Bulding codes can have so many hurdles to complete that a Solar Installation gets abandoned complying with the non-solar part of the project. Our communith as very small back yards (limits on ground coverage rules are consumed by the house and required Garage/driveway). There areSolar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
Yard “nazis” are abundant in many neighborhoods. City hall passes ordinances all the time (IMHO jsust to get them off their backs) based upon their gripes.
Yard nazis generally refer to enforcers of CC&Rs. While the majority of residents in HOAs (home owner associations) seem to complain mightlily about rule enforcement, they all signed a contract before moving in. HOAs are still spreading like wildfire last I heard. I guess it’s because people like the concept. The article mentioned that everybody seems to like eforcement, until the rules apply to them. Go figger. BTW, I’ve lived in a regulated development, served on some boards, and written enforcement letters. Gawd I wish whine….er, people, would learn to read *before* signing. Many complexes DO have a no outdoor antenna policy.
Don’t know about regular antennas, but satellite dishes below a certain size are permitted regardless of HOA rules. If I lived in development which banned dishes, I’d put one up just to irritate the yard nazis. Bulding codes can have so many hurdles to complete that a Solar Installation gets abandoned complying with the non-solar part of the project. Our communith as very small back yards (limits on ground coverage rules are consumed by the house and required Garage/driveway). There are “shadow cast” rules where again the house as already at the edge of the permitted envelope (new “monster homes”).
My condolences. Apartment dwellers might envy your space though. :-) Notice they did not say NP to solar :/) ?
Is “NP” no problem? Whatever. You can probably find out at homepower.com if you have state laws about renewable energy which trump local ordinances. Wayne
Response:
A batch heater is basically a black water tank in a glass enclosure that warms up the water by the sun light. When I say pre heater I mean to feed the output of this tank to your normal water heater. The idea is that if the batch heater warms the water to temperatures above the ground water you are saving money, because instead of the water heater warming water from 55 degrees to 120 degrees for your hot water, you are only heating it the last few degrees. It takes roughly twice the BTU’s to raise an amount of water 65 degrees as to raise it 32.5 degrees. So even if you are only raising the temperature from 55 to 88.5 degrees you save about 50% of your energy. If you can raise the temperature of the water to say 100 degrees, you get about a 70% savings. The main thing is it is extremely simple and low cost. You don’t need a bunch of coils. If the box is well insulated the mass of water will keep it from freezing in the winter, (be sure to insulate the pipes as they come out.) It will only cost a couple of hundred dollars, and you will probably get your money back in one or two years in energy savings. And there is no maintenance. Solar Panel Inverter batterey
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – A batch preheater is also simple enough that almost anyone can benefit from it immediately without a big cash outlay. I think it would be more energy savings for 50% of the houses in the United States to have batch preheaters than to have 0.00001% of the houses to be totally off the grid. Pardon my ignorance but what is a batch pre-heater? I seached the internet and nothing came up. — All the best, Stephen Horrillo www.iwantsolar.com
Response:
Notice they did not say NP to solar :/) ? Is “NP” no problem? Whatever. You can probably find out at homepower.com if you have state laws about renewable energy which trump local ordinances.
Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
… The main thing is it is extremely simple and low cost.
… Of course, one of the factors that has helped to slow the general rush to install solar water heaters of any kind is that natural gas is very inexpensive. A gas water heater is extremely simple, low cost and fairly fuel efficient today. If you live in an area that has a natural gas utility system then water heating is likely already a very low cost item for you. Even more low cost when you consider that most places will require you to at least own a backup water heater, even if it’s not turned on, when you install a solar water heating system. Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
I clicked on the free-survey information link on your site,Solar Panel Inverter batterey but it only leads to a blank email. Are you selling something? no
Would you please explain what your survey is then. Wayne
Response:
Yard nazis generally refer to enforcers of CC&Rs. While the majority of residents in HOAs (home owner associations) seem to complain mightlily about rule enforcement, they all signed a contract before moving in. HOAs are still spreading like wildfire last I heard. I guess it’s because people like the concept. They also work with the City who will refuse to issue a building permit until you show them written permission from the builder and or HOA. Legal or not, they’ve done it to me many times over.
That happened to me once. I was at the county office to get a building permit. They claimed they needed an OK from the HOA first. LOL. I made a short speech through clenched teeth, and they turned over the permit. These would-be dictators act like they do because people put up with it. Wayne
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Yard nazis generally refer to enforcers of CC&Rs. While the majority of residents in HOAs (home owner associations) seem to complain mightlily about rule enforcement, they all signed a contract before moving in. HOAs are still spreading like wildfire last I heard. I guess it’s because people like the concept. They also work with the City who will refuse to issue a building permit until you show them written permission from the builder and or HOA. Legal or not, they’ve done it to me many times over. That happened to me once. I was at the county office to get a building permit. They claimed they needed an OK from the HOA first. LOL. I made a short speech through clenched teeth, and they turned over the permit. These would-be dictators act like they do because people put up with it. Wayne
Are these HOA’s like what we used to call “covenant neighborhoods” where even exterior paint color is regulated by contract? What are the benefits? Jack
Response:
It takes roughly twice the BTU’s to raise an amount of water 65 degrees as to raise it 32.5 degrees.
Exactly twice.
Response:
It takes roughly twice the BTU’s to raise an amount of water 65 degrees as to raise it 32.5 degrees. Exactly twice.
Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
It takes roughly twice the BTU’s to raise an amount of water 65 degrees as to raise it 32.5 degrees. Exactly twice.
Response:
That happened to me once. I was at the county office to get a building permit. They claimed they needed an OK from the HOA first. LOL. I made a short speech through clenched teeth, and they turned over the permit. These would-be dictators act like they do because people put up with it. Must have been a good speech or a wimpy official. What did you say to get them to back down?
That they were full of shit. There was no county law requiring prior approval by the HOA. Some over-zealous board member from our association had visited the building department, and asked them to insist on prior approval from the association. The county workers had been complying, and probably still are whenever the applicant doesn’t speak up. Officials can’t just make up new rules and procedures. There are rules and procedures to cover that process. :-) Wayne
Response:
It takes roughly twice the BTU’s to raise an amount of water 65 degrees as to raise it 32.5 degrees. Exactly twice.
Except that that disregards heat losses – in the real world, you’ll use more than twice the amount of heat, because the losses are proportional to the temperature difference raise to the power 4/5. — May glorious Shamash make his face to shine upon you Gilgamesh of Uruk now residing in the Kingdom of Mercia
Response:
It takes roughly twice the BTU’s to raise an amount of water 65 degrees as to raise it 32.5 degrees. Exactly twice. Table B-3 of the $14.95 1998 Schaum’s Outline on heat transfer says it takes 0.9988 Btu/lb to raise a pound of water 32.5 F from 51.75 to 84.25, vs 0.9980 from 87.75 to 120.45, a difference of 0.026 Btu
Oops. My mistake. (bunch of 4th decimal place weenies
Response:
TSolar Panel Inverter batterey
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – It takes roughly twice the BTU’s to raise an amount of water 65 degrees as to raise it 32.5 degrees. Exactly twice. Except that that disregards heat losses – in the real world, you’ll use more than twice the amount of heat, because the losses are proportional to the temperature difference raise to the power 4/5. — May glorious Shamash make his face to shine upon you Gilgamesh of Uruk now residing in the Kingdom of Mercia
Response:
It takes roughly twice the BTU’s to raise an amount of water 65 degrees as to raise it 32.5 degrees. Exactly twice. Table B-3 of the $14.95 1998 Schaum’s Outline on heat transfer says it takes 0.9988 Btu/lb to raise a pound of water 32.5 F from 51.75 to 84.25, vs 0.9980 from 87.75 to 120.45, a difference of 0.026 Btu
I’m sure you mean 0.9988 Btu/lb/deg-F, not 0.9988 Btu total
daestrom
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – That happened to me once. I was at the county office to get a building permit. They claimed they needed an OK from the HOA first. LOL. I made a short speech through clenched teeth, and they turned over the permit. These would-be dictators act like they do because people put up with it. Must have been a good speech or a wimpy official. What did you say to get them to back down? That they were full of shit. There was no county law requiring prior approval by the HOA. Some over-zealous board member from our association had visited the building department, and asked them to insist on prior approval from the association. The county workers had been complying, and probably still are whenever the applicant doesn’t speak up. Officials can’t just make up new rules and procedures. There are rules and procedures to cover that process. :-) Wayne
They may have no legal authory to make up new rules and procedures, but it is certainly common for them to do so. It works as long as they don’t go up againts someone who knows the real rules, and stands up to them. Mostly they back down, but often they will go to the mat with you on such things, just cause they can.
Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
I worded it wrong. I meant, when I used them in hotels in Europe, gas fired too, I noticed that it started out feeling hot but cooled down as I stayed in the shower, i.e. I probably got acclimated to the temperature. It forced me to lower the flow rate to get a higher temperature. Worked fine to fill a tub, but was a definite sacrifice when I wanted a shower.
No I do not take a cold showers! You simply buy the unit appropiate to your demand and climate condition. Input water tempeture is of concern as units are sized by gph and tempeture raise. The energy cost to heat water is exactly the same between a tankless unit and a conventional water heater. When you are using hotwater! Where you are saving money is a tankless unit uses no energy when there is no demand. While a conventional water heater uses significant energy to keep water at tempeture 24/7. How much that cost depends tempeture it is much more expensive in a 20 degree garage in the winter than at 90 degrees in the summer. The other major advantage with a tankless system is size! About 10% of conventional water heater, which gives you many more placement options. Allowing you placement closer to use areasfor lower energy loss! Ken
Response:
Yard nazis generally refer to enforcers of CC&Rs. While the majority of residents in HOAs (home owner associations) seem to complain mightlily about rule enforcement, they all signed a contract before moving in. HOAs are still spreading like wildfire last I heard. I guess it’s because people like the concept. They also work with the City who will refuse to issue a building permit until you show them written permission from the builder and or HOA. Legal or not, they’ve done it to me many times over.
That happened to me once. I was at the county office to get a building permit. They claimed they needed an OK from the HOA first. LOL. I made a short speech through clenched teeth, and they turned over the permit. These would-be dictators act like they do because people put up with it. Wayne
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Changed out the old electric water heater for a new tankless on demand system. Electric bill has dropped $30.00 a month. System cost $500 and my old water heater needed replacement which would of cost $200 anyway. Payback in utility savings is less than a year for us! The laws of physics dictate that you can only save what was being lost through the walls of your old tank. Thirty dollars is a hefty loss. How old was your previous tank? Are you saving money by forced concervation, i.e. are you running out of hot water, or have you noticed that you’ve changed Err, ‘tankless’. No tank, heat-on-demand. It’s really, really hard to run out of water. your habits at all to accomodate the new heater? A well insulated tank should only loose around $10/mth in heat, unless you’re in a really cold climate, or you had a really old poorly insulated water heater. — Stirling. —— Prosperity and ruin issue from the power of the tongue. Therefore, guard yourself against thoughtless speech.
If your old heater was not working well, then it would have been wasting energy, so that would account for at least part of the difference – plus you have presumably replaced the timer/thermostat and that, again, would reuce your losses. — May glorious Shamash make his face to shine upon you Gilgamesh of Uruk now residing in the Kingdom of Mercia
Response:
… I wish! My water comes into my house at about 45 deg F. Last I looked there wasn’t an electric unit I could install that would increase the hot water to 105 for a shower. Ok, some numbers off the top of my head. Let’s say you are taking a shower using 2 gal/minute. Your water is going from 45F to 105F or 60F. The water heater(s) need to raise the temperature of 120 gallons (8.34×120=1001 lbs) 60F per hour. One BTU raises one lb of water one deg F so this means we would need (1001×60=) 60060 BTU per hour
Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
<snip There are other ways, for example heat-exchangers to recover heat from the waste water could dramatically reduce power bills for showers.
http://www.oikos.com/esb/49/gfx.html Device Recovers Waste Energy From Drain Water The Department of Energy wants electric hot water production to be substantially more efficient by the year 2000, but the chances of pulling that off are slim with current water heater technology. Anything that helps builders meet the goal is bound to be well-received. That’s where the GFX comes in. The GFX is a counterflow heat exchanger. It consists of a coil of 1/2- or 3/4-in. copper tubing that’s tightly wrapped around a 3- or 4-in. diameter copper pipe. The device is installed vertically in the plumbing system. As waste water flows down through the vertical pipe section, it naturally clings to the walls of the pipe. More than half the waste water’s heat energy is transferred through the copper pipe and tubing to the incoming cold water. There is no pump and no storage tank. The device uses no electricity, so there is no operating cost. GFX only works when the drain and supply lines are being used simultaneously–as when someone is taking a shower. Tests, sponsored by Virginia Power, were performed at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia. The GFX was paired with various electric water heaters. The tests indicated that the $180 device can save up to 50 percent of the energy a home uses to heat water. In fact, when the GFX was installed, the water heater’s upper elements never energized, something the test report calls “a significant result.” GFX has been demonstrated in several model energy-efficient homes including one operated by the National Association of Homebuilders’ Research Center. — Steve Spence Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter & Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology: http://www.green-trust.org
Response:
Table B-3 of the $14.95 1998 Schaum’s Outline on heat transfer says it takes 0.9988 Btu/lb to raise a pound of water 32.5 F from 51.75 to 84.25, vs 0.9980 from 87.75 to 120.45, a difference of 0.026 Btu
I’m sure you mean 0.9988 Btu/lb/deg-F, not 0.9988 Btu total
Yes, and 120.25 vs 120.45. Nick
Response:
“The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price! Ben Franklin” – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Only if you want to fill a bucket with a given temperature of water. If you are (for example) taking a shower, then a reducing the wattage of the heater will cause you to lower the flow to keep the temperature right. You won’t spend (much) longer in the shower, so it may be a net energy saving. If you are running a hotel, then ‘undersized’ water heaters might save you a moderate amount of money. Sounds like the same thing could be accomplished with a low flow showerhead. If the shower sucks I’m out of there much faster. IMO, this is precisely what holds back legitimate conservation efforts like solar water heaters and the like. People are sold some lower priced magic device. They buy it based on economics, psuedoscience, or thinking it’s possible to get something for little or nothing. Then they feel they need to defend their mistake for a while. They pretend they’re not suffering, until it breaks, then they go back to what they had in the first place, forever left with a bitter taste in their mouth about energy efficiency. Timers, low flow showerheads, tankless heaters. They’re all based on a mindset of “lack” rather than “abundance.” I’ve seen it first hand selling Solar Water Heaters. The miserly husband won’t admit he was wrong. Has all sorts of excuses. “I never run out of hot water.” “Cold showers are healthier.” While the wife is there staring holes in him. It’s my guess he’ll be taking alot of cold showers.
Response:
“Tests, sponsored by Virginia Power, were performed at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia. The GFX was paired with various electric water heaters. The tests indicated that the $180 device can save up to 50 percent of the energy a home uses to heat water. In fact, when the GFX was installed, the water heater’s upper elements never energized, something the test report calls “a significant result.” Why would a power company sponsor something that saves 50 percent of the energy a home uses to heat water? So they don’t have to build more power plants, so the can’t sell power to other states at a premium? — All the best, www.iwantsolar.com
Response:
… But I’m convinced closed loop antifreeze is the way to go… The heat exchanger seems large and expensive and inefficient by comparison.
I needed a new tank anyway, to replace the one that failed due to the ravages of open loop operation. I could have spent three times as much for a pressure-capable stainless or stone-lined tank, trying to delay having to do this replacement again. Compared to the cost and hassle of swapping open-loop equipment, the extra cost of the exchanger tubing was trivial. It all fits in the same space as the old system, actually less than the drainback system used, and with only dead water in the tank, it should never again fail. If you go with the usual fancy pressurized tank with a single input exchanger, then yes, the cost is unreasonable. And it looks to me like even with stainless or stone tanks, you can count on a replacement in 15 years or less. Once you decide to keep the pressurized hot water in a separate exchanger coil, the cost of the tank drops way down, and the lifetime goes way up. I’ve ended up with a system I believe solves all these problems. There is a “primary loop” with antifreeze which runs through the input coils (five parallel 50′ coils of copper tubing) of my exchanger tank… That’s for solar charging, with hot antifreeze in the coils… …250′ of 1/2″ tubing would have about 33 ft^2 of surface and store about 3 gallons of water. I’d guess NTU = 30×33/(3×8x60) = 0.68, after the first 3 gallons, with E = 1-e^-NTU = 0.49… 50 F water in a 140 F tank might emerge from the coil at 50+0.49(140-50) = 94.5 F. You have another 250′ of tubing for heating pressurized cold water?
Yes. Actually the input tubing is 5/8″, to get the flow rate up on the Seahorse pump. The output tubing is 1/2″, matching your calcs. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I really did try to make NTU work, even built an Excel sheet to automate it. But I ended up having to put in numbers like 90 for U (Cu is supposed to be 30) to get anywhere near the actual performance I observe. I can’t imagine what I’m doing wrong with the numbers or right with the hardware, but the real system works way better than I thought it would. I measured 30 for still water, but the cold water inside the tubing is flowing, which lowers the inside film conductance… One possibility I don’t think NTU accounts for is stratification – my domestic water enters at the bottom of the coils, and cools the bottom of the tank first. By the time it gets to the top end it needs very little more transfer to match the hot layer at the top of the tank. Counterflow is the right direction…
Interesting question, what is “counterflow” when there are two separated coils in dead water? My heat input flows downward from the top of the tank, the DHW output flows upward, maximizing the stratification. … I’ve been extremely pleased with the result. With a 3 GPM flow and 90F rise, the DHW comes out within a degree or two of the water in the top of the exchanger tank. Sounds lovely. Have you measured this after the first 3 gallons? Yes, and I don’t find any change at all between the first three and later gallons… Have you measured the antifreeze exit temp in the solar heating loop?
Depends on the usage history and the incoming sun, of course. At the moment (about noon) the nominal tank sensor (about 1/3 of the way up) is 127, the cold out is 112, and the return from the panels is 132. The tank target is currently 130F; extra heat goes into the hot tub, which is switched into the loop just ahead of the panels. Probably more useful is data from the gas heater – 50KBTU provides just about 20F rise across the 5/8″ input coils. Loren
Response:
I clicked on the free-survey information link on your site, but it only leads to a blank email. Are you selling something? no
Would you please explain what your survey is then. Wayne
Response:
… I wish! My water comes into my house at about 45 deg F. Last I looked there wasn’t an electric unit I could install that would increase the hot water to 105 for a shower. I’d love to be proven wrong on my last statement, if anyone has any info. Use two, one installed in series after the other. Each one only has to raise the temperature 30 degrees F. How much wattage do you figure that would consume?
Twice as much as one.
Ok, some numbers off the top of my head. Let’s say you are taking a shower using 2 gal/minute. Your water is going from 45F to 105F or 60F. The water heater(s) need to raise the temperature of 120 gallons (8.34×120=1001 lbs) 60F per hour. One BTU raises one lb of water one deg F so this means we would need (1001×60=) 60060 BTU per hour or (60060/3415=) 17.6 kWh per hour. This amounts to 17.6 kW to run that heater or (17600/220=) 80 amps at 220V or 160 amps at 110V. This is rather much for a single circuit on most homes wiring so it might require two units at 40 amps each (8.8 kW) or three at 26.7 amps each (5.8 kW) on 220V lines. Most low flow showers seem to run about 1.8 to 2.4 gpm. There are some that do less than one gpm and the older showers seemed to average about 5 gpm. Anthony
Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
I’m interested in experiences with various tankless/solar hot water systems. Ours just burned out (Myson tankless) after the vent was buried in snow.
Snow? You might want to consider how feasable a solar heater is in your area: http://www.homepower.com/education/solar_map.cfm
Response:
I’m interested in experiences with various tankless/solar hot water systems. Ours just burned out (Myson tankless) after the vent was buried in snow. I might try to fix it, but I’d like to know what the other experiences with Aquastar, Paloma, etc are. We are a family of 4 on propane with water efficient appliances planning to install solar DHW in the future, so this will revert to a backup some day. On the other hand, I might just go ahead an install a tank intended for solar hot water, so that we just hook up the panels and piping and we are done. Any experiences with either tankless or solar/propane hot water heaters? My wife likes hot water, so your timely response would be most appreciated! Will – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Can anyone tell me if they have had experience ( good or bad) with the 125 series AquaStar by Bosch tankless water heaters. They look real good on paper. Also does anyone know how they handle extremely hard water. Bosch say just remove exchanger, soak in vinegar, and re-install. Do this every couple of years. Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Response:
Obviously you have freezing temperatures to deal with. I struggled with each of the solar freeze protection systems in turn: The dribble valve wasted too much heat and too much water and eventually buried itself in ice anyway. To get the water up to the roof, the drainback system needed a big pump that was too noisy and too power hungry to run on PV. The draindown valve couldn’t handle my hard water and needed continuous attention… Sounds like you put in your struggling time. Did you consider letting the downgoing water help lift the upgoing water in a draindown system with a downpipe restriction that would put the solar collectors under a slight vacuum? Acorn solar houses worked this way.
I’m not sure what you are suggesting here. My draindown system (built by a local “professional”) was open-loop. When the “Sunspool” valve opened, the panels filled with no problem by the pressure of my domestic water system. The problem was with the valve itself and my hard water; it would stick, fail to close fully, and have to be disassembled, cleaned and lubed regularly. The tiniest bit of scale would keep the check ball from seating, and dump all the heat back out at night. And the connections to the heating element material for the “heat motor” in the valve kept failing. After replacing several actuators (at around $180 each), I finally developed a spring-loaded contact system to get power into the motor. Ugly, but it lasted for years. Solar Panel Inverter batterey
Categories: